Charles Spurgeon Collection: Spurgeon - C.H. - Sermons from Acts: 16 - ACT 13:49 Gospel Missions

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

Charles Spurgeon Collection: Spurgeon - C.H. - Sermons from Acts: 16 - ACT 13:49 Gospel Missions



TOPIC: Spurgeon - C.H. - Sermons from Acts (Other Topics in this Collection)
SUBJECT: 16 - ACT 13:49 Gospel Missions

Other Subjects in this Topic:

                  Gospel Missions



April 27, 1856

by

C. H. SPURGEON

(1834-1892)



"And the word of the Lord was published throughout all the region."- Act_13:49.



I shall not confine myself to the text. It being an old custom to take texts

when we preach, I have taken one, but I shall address you, at large, upon a

subject which I am sure will occupy your attention, and has done for many

days and years past-the subject of gospel missions. We feel persuaded that

all of you are of one mind in this matter, that it is the absolute duty as

well as the eminent privilege of the Church to proclaim the gospel to the

world. We do not conceive that God will do his own work without instruments,

but that, as he has always employed means in the work of the regeneration of

this world, he will still continue to do the same, and that it becomes the

Church to do its utmost to spread the truth wherever it can reach the ear of

man. We have not two opinions on that point. Some churches may have, but we

have not. Our doctrines, although they are supposed to lead to apathy and

sloth, have always proved themselves to be eminently practical; the fathers

of the mission were all zealous lovers of the doctrines of the grace of God;

and we believe, the great supporters of missionary enterprise, if it is to be

successful, must always come from those who hold God's truth firmly and

boldly, and yet have fire and zeal with it, and desire to spread it

everywhere. But there is a point on which we have great division of opinion,

and that is as to the reason why we have had so little success in our

missionary labours. There may be some who say the success has been

proportionate to the agency, and that we could not have been more successful.

I am far from being of their opinion, and I do not think they themselves

would express it on their knees before Almighty God. We have not been

successful to the extent we might have expected, certainly not to an

apostolic extent, certainly with nothing like the success of Paul or Peter,

or even of those imminent men who have preceded us in modern times, and who

were able to evangelize whole countries, turning thousands to God. Now, what

is the reason of this? Perhaps we may turn our eyes on high, and think we

find that reason in the sovereignty of God, which hath withholden his Spirit,

and hath not poured out his grace as aforetime. I shall be prepared to grant

all men may say on that point, for I believe in the ordination of everything

by Almighty God. I believe in a present God in our defeats as well as in our

successes; a God as well in the motionless air as in the careering tempest; a

God of ebbs as well as a God of floods. But still we must look at home for

the cause. When Zion travails, she brings forth children; when Zion is in

earnest, God is in earnest about his work; when Zion is prayerful, God

blesses her. We must not, therefore, arbitrarily look for the cause of our

failure in the will of God, but we must also see what is the difference

between ourselves and the men of Apostolic times, and what it is that renders

our success so trifling in comparison with the tremendous results of

Apostolic preaching. I think I shall be able to show one or two reasons why

our holy faith is not so prosperous as it was then. In the first place, we

have not Apostolic men; in the second place, they do not set about their work

in an Apostolic style; in the third place, we have not Apostolic churches to

back them up; and in the fourth place, we have not the Apostolic influence of

the Holy Ghost. in the measure which they had it in ancient times.



I. First, WE HAVE FEW APOSTOLIC MEN IN THESE TIMES. I will not say we have

none; here and there we may have one or two, but unhappily their names are

never heard; they do not start out before the world, and are not noted as

preachers of God's truth. We had a Williams once, a true apostle, who went

from island to island, not counting his life dear unto him; but Williams is

called to his reward. We had a Knibb, who toiled for his Master with seraphic

earnestness, and was not ashamed to call an oppressed slave his brother; but

Knibb, too, has entered into his rest. We have one or two still remaining,

precious and treasured names; we love them fervently, and our prayers shall

ever rise to heaven on their behalf. We always say, in our prayers, "God

bless such men as Moffat! God bless those who are earnestly toiling and

successfully labouring!" But cast your eyes around, and where can we find

many such men? They are all good men; we find no fault with them; they are

better than we; we, ourselves, shrink into nothingness compared with them;

but we must still say of them that they are less than their fathers, they

differ from the mighty Apostles in many respects, which we think even they

would not be slow to own. I am not speaking of missionaries only, but of

ministers too; for I take it we have as much to mourn over in regard to the

spread of the gospel in England as in foreign lands, and much to regret the

lack of men filled with the Holy Ghost and with fire.



In the first place, we have not men with Apostolic zeal. Converted in a most

singular way, by a direct interposition from heaven, Paul, from that time

forward became an earnest man. He had always been earnest, in his sin and in

his persecutions; but after he heard that voice from heaven, "Saul, Saul, why

persecutest thou me?" and had received the mighty office of an apostle, and

had been sent forth a chosen vessel to the Gentiles, you can scarce conceive

the deep, the awful earnestness which he manifested. Whether he did eat, or

drink, or whatsoever he did, he did all for the glory of his God; he never

wasted an hour; he was employing his time either in ministering with his own

hands unto his necessities, or else lifting those hands in the Synagogue, on

Mars-hill, or anywhere where he could command the attention of the multitude.

His zeal was so earnest, and so burning, that he could not (as we

unfortunately do) restrain himself within a little sphere; but he preached

the Word everywhere. It was not enough for him to have it handed down that he

was the Apostle of Pisidia, but he must go also to Pamphylia; it was not

enough that he should be the great preacher of Pamphylia and Pisidia, but he

must go also to Attalia; and when he had preached throughout all Asia, he

must needs take ship to Greece, and preach there also. I believe not once

only did Paul hear in his dream the men of Macedonia saying, "Come over and

help us," but every day and hour he heard the cry in his ears from multitudes

of souls, "Paul, Paul, come over and help us." He could not restrain himself

from preaching. "Woe is unto me" he said "if I preach not the gospel. God

forbid that I should glory save in the cross of Christ." Oh! if you could

have seen Paul preach, you would not have gone away as you do from some of

us, with half a conviction, that we do not mean what we say. His eyes

preached a sermon without his lips, and his lips preached it, not in a cold

and frigid manner, but every word fell with an overwhelming power upon the

hearts of his hearers. He preached with power, because he was in downright

earnest. You had a conviction, when you saw him, that he was a man who felt

he had a work to do and must do it, and could not contain himself unless he

did do it. He was the kind of preacher whom you would expect to see walk down

the pulpit stairs straight into his coffin, and then stand before his God,

ready for his last account. Where are the men like that man? I confess I

cannot claim that privilege, and I seldom hear a solitary sermon which comes

up to the mark in earnest, deep, passionate longing for the souls of men.



We have no eyes now like the eyes of the Saviour, which could weep over

Jerusalem; we have few voices like that earnest impassioned voice which

seemed perpetually to cry, "Come unto me, and I will give you rest." "O

Jerusalem, Jerusalem, how often would I have gathered thee as a hen gathereth

her chickens under her wings, but ye would not." If ministers of the gospel

were more hearty in their work of preaching; if, instead of giving lectures

and devoting a large part of their time to literary and political pursuits,

they would preach the Word of God, and preach it as if they were pleading for

their own lives, ah! then, my brethren, we might expect great success; but we

cannot expect it while we go about our work in a half-hearted way, and have

not that zeal, that earnestness, that deep purpose which characterized those

men of old.



Then, again, I take it we have not men in our days who can preach like Paul-

as to their faith. What did Paul do? He went to Philippi; did he know a soul

there? Not one. He had his Master's truth, and he believed in the power of

it. He was unattended and devoid of pomp, or show, or parade; he did not go

to a pulpit with a soft cushion in it to address a respectable congregation,

but he walked through the streets and began to preach to the people. He went

to Corinth, to Athens, alone, single-handed, to tell the people the gospel of

the blessed God. Why? Because he had faith in the gospel and believed it

would save souls, and hurl down idols from their thrones. He had no doubt

about the power of the gospel; but now-a-days, my brethren, we have not faith

in the gospel we preach. How many there are who preach gospel, which they are

afraid will not save souls; and, therefore, they add little bits of their own

to it in order, as they think, to win men to Christ! We have known men who

believed Calvinistic doctrines, but who preached Calvinism in the morning and

Arminianism in the evening, because they were afraid God's gospel would not

convert sinners, so they would manufacture one of their own. I hold that a

man who does not believe his gospel to be able to save men's souls, does not

believe it all. If God's truth will not save men's souls, man's lies cannot;

if God's truth will not turn men to repentance, I am sure there is nothing in

this world that can. When we believe the gospel to be powerful, then we shall

see it is powerful. If I walk into this pulpit, and say, "I know what I

preach is true," the world says I am an egotist. "The young man is

dogmatical." Ay, and the young man means to be; he glories in it, he keeps it

to himself as one of his peculiar titles, for he does most firmly believe

what he preaches. God forbid that I should ever come tottering up the pulpit

stairs to teach anything I was not quite sure of, something which I hoped

might save sinners, but of which I was not exactly certain. When I have faith

in my doctrines, those doctrines will prevail, for confidence is the winner

of the palm. He who hath courage enough to grasp the standard, and hold it

up, will be sure enough to find followers. He who says, "I know," and asserts

it boldly in his Master's name, without disputing, will not be long before he

will find men who will listen to what he says, and who will say, "This man

speaks with authority, and not as the Scribes and Pharisees." That is one

reason why we do not succeed: we have not faith in the gospel. We send

educated men to India in order to confound the learned Brahmins. Nonsense!

Let the Brahmins say what they like, have we any business to dispute with

them? "Oh, but they are so intellectual and so clever." What have we to do

with that? We are not to seek to be clever in order to meet them. Leave the

men of the world to combat their metaphysical errors; we have merely to say,

"This is truth: he that believeth it shall be saved, and he that denieth it

shall be damned." We have no right to come down from the high ground of

divine authoritative testimony; and until we maintain that ground, and come

out as we ought to do, girded with the belt of divinity-preaching not what

may be true, but asserting that which God has most certainly revealed-we

shall not see success. We want a deeper faith in our gospel; we want to be

quite sure of what we preach. Brethren, I take it we have not the faith of

our fathers. I feel myself a poor drivelling thing in point of faith. Why,

methought sometimes I could believe anything; but now a little difficulty

comes before me, I am timid, and I fear. It is when I preach with unbelief in

my heart that I preach unsuccessfully; but when I preach with faith and can

say, "I know my God has said, that in the self-same hour he will give me what

I shall preach, and careless of man's esteem, I preach what I believe to be

true," then it is that God owns faith and crowns it with his own crown.



Again: we have not enough self-denial, and that is one reason why we do not

prosper. Far be it from me to say aught against the self-denial of those

worthy brethren who have left their country to cross the stormy deep and

preach the Word. We hold them to be men who are to be had in honour; but

still I ask, where is the self-denial of the Apostles now-a-days? I think one

of the greatest disgraces that ever was cast upon the church in these days

was that last mission to Ireland. Men went over to Ireland, but like men who

have valour's better part, brave bold men, they came back again, which is

about all we can say of the matter. Why do they not go there again? Why, they

say the Irish "hooted" at them. Now, don't you think you see Paul taking a

microscope out of his pocket, and looking at the little man who should say to

him, "I shall not go there to preach because the Irish hooted me?" "What!" he

says, "is this a preacher?-what a small edition of a minister he must be, to

be sure!" "Oh! but they threw stones at us; you have no idea how badly they

treated us!" Just tell that to the Apostle Paul. I am sure you would be

ashamed to do so. "Oh! but in some places the police interfered, and said

that we should only create a riot." What would Paul have said to that? The

police interfering! I did not know that we had any right to care about

governments. Our business is to preach the Word, and if we must be put in the

stocks there let us lie; there would come no hurt of it at last. "Oh! but

they might have killed some of us." That is just it. Where is that zeal which

counted not its life dear so that it might win Christ? I believe that the

killing of a few of our ministers would have prospered Christianity. However

we might mourn over it, and none more than myself, I say the murder of a

dozen of them would have been no greater ground for grief than the slaughter

of our men by hundreds in a successful fight for hearths and homes. I would

count my own blood most profitably shed in so holy a struggle. How did the

gospel prosper aforetime? Were there not some who laid down their lives for

it; and did not others walk to victory over their slain bodies; and must it

not be so now? If we are to start back because we are afraid of being killed,

heaven knows when the gospel is to spread over the world-we do not. What have

other missionaries done? Have they not braved death in its direst forms, and

preached the Word amid countless dangers? My brethren, we say again, we find

no fault, for we, ourselves, might err in the same manner; but we are sure we

are therein not like Paul. He went to a place where they stoned him with

stones, and dragged him out as dead. Did he say, "Now for the future I will

not go where they will ill-treat me?" No, for he says, "Of the Jews five

times received I forty stripes save one. Thrice was I beaten with rods,

thrice I suffered shipwreck." I am sure we have not the self-denial of the

Apostles. We are mere carpet-knights and Hyde-park-warriors. When I go to my

own house and think how comfortable and happy I am, I say to myself, "How

little I do for my Master! I am ashamed that I cannot deny myself for his

truth, and go everywhere preaching his Word." I look with pity upon people

who say "Do not preach so often; you will kill yourself." O my God! what

would Paul have said to such a thing as that? "Take care of your

constitution; you are rash; you are enthusiastic." When I compare myself with

one of those men of old, I say, "Oh that men should be found calling

themselves Christians, who seek to stop our work of faith and labour of love,

for the sake of a little consideration about the 'constitution,' which gets

all the stronger for the preaching of God's Word."



But I hear some one whispering, "You ought to make a little allowance." My

dear friend, I make all allowance. I am not finding fault with those

brethren; they are a good sort of people; we are "all honorable men;" but I

will only say, that in comparison with Paul, we are less than nothing, and

vanity; little insignificant Lilliputian creatures, who can hardly be seen in

comparison with those gigantic men of old.



Ones of my hearers may perhaps hint that this is not the sole cause, and he

observes, "I think you ought to make excuse, for ministers now cannot work

miracles." Well, I have considered that too, and certainly it is a drawback,

but, I take it, not a very great one; for if it had been, God would not have

allowed it to exist. He gave that gift to the Church in its infancy, but now

it needs it no longer. We mistake in attributing too much to miracles. What

was one of them? Wherever the Apostles went they could speak the language of

the people. Well, in the time it would have taken Paul to walk from here to

Hindostan, we could learn Hindostani, and we can go over in a very little

time by the means of travelling that are now provided: so that is no great

gain there. Then, again, in order to make the gospel known amongst the

people, it was necessary that miracles should be worked, so that every one

might talk about it; but now there is a printing press to aid us. What I say

to-day, within six months will be read across the Alleghanies; and so with

other ministers, what they say and what they do can soon be printed off and

distributed everywhere; so they have facilities for making themselves known

which are not much behind the power of miracles. Again, we have a great

advantage over the Apostles. Wherever they went they were persecuted, and

sometimes put to death; but now, although occasionally we hear of the

massacre of a missionary, the occurrence is rare enough. The slaughter of an

Englishman anywhere would provoke a fleet of men-of-war to visit the offence

with chastisement. The world respects an Englishman wherever he goes; he has

the stamp of the great Caesar upon him; he is the true cosmopolite-the

citizen of the world. That could not be said of the poor despised Jews. There

might be some respect paid to Paul, for he was a Roman citizen, but there

would be none paid to the rest. We cannot be put to death now without a noise

being made. The murder of two or three ministers in Ireland would provoke a

tumult through the country; the government would have to interpose, the

orderly of the land would be up in arms, and then we might preach with an

armed constabulary around us, and so go through the land, provoking the

priests, startling antichrist, and driving superstition to its dens for ever.



II. In the second place, WE DO NOT GO ABOUT OUR WORK IN AN APOSTOLIC STYLE.

How is that? Why, in the first place, there is a general complaint that there

is not enough preaching by ministers and missionaries. They sit down

interpreting, establishing schools, and doing this, that, and the other. We

have nothing to find fault with in this; but that is not the labour to which

they should devote themselves; their office is preaching, and if they

preached more, they might hope for more success. The missionary Chamberlain

preached once at a certain place, and years afterwards disciples were found

there from that one sermon. Williams preached wherever he went, and God

blessed him; Moffat preached wherever he went, and his labours were owned.

Now we have our churches, our printing-presses, about which a great deal of

money is spent. This is doing good, but it is not doing the good. We are not

using the means which God has ordained, and we cannot therefore expect to

prosper. Some say there is too much preaching now-a-days, in England. Well,

it is the tendency of the times to decry preaching, but it is "the

foolishness of preaching" which is to change the world. It is not for men to

say, "If you preached less, you might study more." Study is required well

enough if you have a settled church; but the Apostles needed no study, I

apprehend, but they stood up and delivered out the simple cardinal truths of

religion, not taking one text, but going through the whole catalogue of

truth. So I think, in itinerant evangelical labours, we are not bound to

dwell on one subject, for then we need to study, but we shall find it

profitable to deal out the whole truth wherever we go. Thus we should always

find words to hand, and truths ever ready to teach the people.



In the next place I conceive that a great mistake has been made in not

affirming the divinity of our mission, and standing fast by the truth, as

being a revelation not to be proved by men, but to be believed; always

holding out this, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; he that

believeth not shall be damned." I am often grieved when I read of our

missionaries holding disputes with the Brahmins, and it is sometimes said

that the missionary has beaten the Brahmin because he kept his temper, and so

the gospel had gained great honour by the dispute. I take it that the gospel

was lowered by the controversy. I think the missionary should say, "I am come

to tell you something which the One God of heaven and earth hath said, and I

tell you before I announce it, that if you believe it you shall be saved, and

if not, you shall be damned. I am come to tell you that Jesus Christ, the Son

of God, became flesh, to die for poor unworthy man, that through his

mediation, and death, and suffering, the people of God might be delivered.

Now, if you will listen to me you shall hear the word of God: if you do not,

I shake the dust of my feet against you, and go somewhere else." Look at the

history of every imposture; it shows us that the claim of authority insures a

degree of progress. How did Mahommed come to have so strong a religion in his

time? He was all alone, and he went into the market-place and said, "I have

received a revelation from heaven." It was a lie, but he persuaded men to

believe it. People looked at his face; they saw that he looked upon them

earnestly as believing what he said, and some five or six of them joined him.

Did he prove what he said? Not he. "You must," he said, "believe what I say,

or there is no Paradise for you." There is power in that kind of thing, and

wherever he went his statement was believed, not on the ground of reasoning,

but on his authority, which he declared to be from Allah; and in a century

after he first proclaimed his imposture, a thousand sabres had flashed from a

thousand sheaths, and his word had been proclaimed through Africa, Turkey,

Asia, and even in Spain. The man claimed authority-he claimed divinity;

therefore he had power. Take again the increase of Mormonism. What has been

its strength? Simply this-the assertion of power from heaven. That claim is

made, and the people believe it, and now they have missionaries in almost

every country of the habitable globe, and the book of Mormon is translated

into many languages. Though there never could be a delusion more transparent,

or a counterfeit less skilful, and more lying upon the very surface, yet this

simple pretension to power has been the means of carrying power with it. Now,

my brethren, we have power; we are God's ministers; we preach God's truth;

the great Judge of heaven and earth has told us the truth, and what have we

to do to dispute with worms of the dust? Why should we tremble and fear them?

Let us stand out and say, "We are the servants of the living God; we tell

unto you what God has told us, and we warn you, if you reject our testimony,

it shall be better for Tyre and Sidon in the day of judgment than for you."

If the people cast that away we have done our work. We have nothing to do

with making men believe; ours is to testify of Christ everywhere, to preach

and to proclaim the gospel to all men.



But there is one passage in the Bible which seems to militate against what I

have said, if the common translation be true-the passage which says that Paul

"disputed in the school of one Tyrannus." But this is better rendered in

English, he "dialogued in the school of one Tyrannous." Albert Barnes says,

that "disputed is not a happy translation," for there is no such idea

conveyed by the word. Jesus, when he preached, "dialogued." When the man came

and said to him, "Master, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?" he

"dialogued" with him. When another said unto him, "Speak, Lord, unto my

brother, that he divide with me the inheritance," Christ did not dispute with

him, but he "dialogued." His usual style was to address the people, and but

rarely to dispute with men. We might give up all the books that have been

written in defence of Christianity if we would but preach Christ, if, instead

of defending the outposts, we were to say, "God will take care of them," and

were at once to make a sortie on the enemy; then by God's Holy Spirit we

should carry everything before us. O, Church of God! believe thyself

invincible, and thou art invincible; but stay to tremble, and fear, and thou

art undone. Lift up thy head and say, "I am God's daughter; I am Christ's

bride." Do not stop to prove it, but affirm it; march through the land, and

kings and princes shall bow down before thee, because thou hast taken thine

ancient prowess and assumed thine ancient glory.



I have one more remark to make here with regard to the style in which we go

to work. I fear that we have not enough of the divine method of itinerancy.

Paul was a great itinerant: he preached in one place, and there were twelve

converted there; he made a church at once; he did not stop till he had five

hundred; but when he had twelve, he went off to another place. A holy woman

takes him in; she has a son and daughter; they are saved and baptized-there

is another church. Then he goes on; wherever he goes the people believe and

are baptized, wherever he meets a family who believe, he or his companion

baptizes all the house, and goes about his way still forming churches and

appointing elders over them. We, now-a-days, go and settle in a place, make a

station of it, and work around it by little and little, and think that is the

way to succeed. No, no! ravage a continent; attempt great things and great

things shall be done. But they say if you just pass over a place it will be

forgotten like the summer shower, which moistens all, but satisfies none.

Yes, but you do not know how many of God's elect may be there; you have no

business to stop in one place; go straight on; God's elect are everywhere. I

protest if I could not itinerate this country of England, I could not bear to

preach. If I preached here always, many of you would become gospel hardened.

I love to go ranging here, there, and everywhere. My highest ambition is

this, that I may be found going through the entire land, as well as holding

my head quarters in one position. I do hold that itinerancy is God's great

plan. There should be fixed ministers and pastors, but those who are like

apostles should itinerate far more than they do.



III. But I have a third thing to say which will strike home to some of us:

that is, that WE HAVE NOT APOSTOLIC CHURCHES. Oh! had you seen an Apostolic

church, what a different thing it would appear to one of our churches! as

different, I had almost said, as light from darkness, as different as the

shallow bed of the brook that is dried by summer is from the mighty rolling

river, ever full, ever deep and clear, and ever rushing into the sea. Now,

where is our prayerfulness compared with theirs? I trust that we know

something of the power of prayer here, but I do not think we pray like they

did. "They broke bread from house to house, and did eat their meat with

singleness of heart, giving glory to God." There was not a member of the

Church, as a rule, who was half-hearted; they gave their souls wholly to God;

and when Anaias and Sapphira divided the price, they were smitten with death

for their sin. Oh! if we prayed as deeply and as earnestly as they did, we

should have as much success. Any measure of success we may have had here has

been entirely owing under God to your prayers; and wherever I have gone, I

have boasted that I have a praying people. Let other ministers have as

prayerful a people; let missionaries have as many prayers from the Church,

and, all things being equal, God will bless them, and there will be greater

prosperity than ever.



We have not the Apostolic mode of liberality. In the Apostles' days they gave

all their substance. It was not demanded of them then, and it is not now, no

one thinks of asking such a thing; still we have run to the other extreme,

and many give nothing at all. Men who have thousands and tens of thousands

are so eternally considerate for their families, albeit they are provided

for, that they give nothing more than the servant girl who sits next to them.

It is a common saying, that members of Christian Churches do not give in

proportion to their wealth. We give because it is genteel and respectable. A

great many of us give I hope, because we love the cause of God; but many of

us say, "There is a poor bricklayer, working hard all the week and only

earning just enough to keep his wife and family: he will give a shilling;

now, I have so many pounds a week-I am a rich man-what shall I give? why, I

will give half-a-crown." Another says, "I will give ten shillings this

morning." Now, if they measured their wealth in comparison with his, they

would see that he gives all he has left above his maintenance, while they

give comparatively nothing. My brethren, we are not half Christians; that is

the reason why we have not half success. We are Christianised, but I question

whether we are thoroughly so. The Spirit of God hath not entered into us to

give us that life, and fire, and soul, which they had in these ancient times.



IV. But lastly, as the result of the other things which have gone before, and

perhaps partly as the cause of them too, WE HAVE NOT THE HOLY SPIRIT IN THAT

MEASURE WHICH ATTENDED THE APOSTLES. I see no reason whatever, why, this

morning, if God willed it, I should not stand up and preach a sermon which

should be the means of converting every soul in the place. I see no reason

why I should not, tomorrow, preach a sermon which should be the means of the

salvation of all who heard it, if God the Spirit were poured out. The word is

able to convert, just as extensively as God the Spirit pleases to apply it;

and I can see no reason why, if converts come in by ones and twos now, there

should not be a time when hundreds and thousands shall come to God. The same

sermon which God blesses to ten if he pleased he could bless to a hundred. I

know not but that in the latter days when Christ shall come and shall begin

to take the kingdom to himself, every minister of God shall be as successful

as Peter on the day of Pentecost. I am sure the Holy Spirit is able to make

the word successful, and the reason why we do not prosper is that we have not

the Holy Spirit attending us with might and energy as they had then. My

brethren, if we had the Holy Spirit upon our ministry, it would signify very

little about our talent. Men might be poor and uneducated; their words might

be broken and ungrammatical; there might be no polished periods of Hall, or

glorious thunders of Chalmers; but if there were the might of the Spirit

attending them, the humblest evangelists would be more successful than the

most pompous of divines, or the most eloquent of preachers. It is

extraordinary grace, not talent, that wins the day; extraordinary spiritual

power, not extraordinary mental power. Mental power may fill a chapel; but

spiritual power fills the Church. Mental power may gather a congregation;

spiritual power will save souls. We want spiritual power. Oh! we know some

before whom we shrink into nothing as to talent, but who have no spiritual

power, and when they speak they have not the Holy Spirit with them; but we

know others, simple hearted worthy men who speak their country dialect, and

who stand up to preach in their country place, and the Spirit of God clothes

every word with power; hearts are broken, souls are saved, and sinners are

born again. Spirit of the living God! we want thee. Thou art the life, the

soul; thou art the source of thy people's success; without thee they can do

nothing, with thee they can do everything.



Thus I have tried to show you what I conceive to be the causes of our partial

non-success. And now permit me, with all earnestness, to plead with you on

behalf of Christ and Christ's Holy Gospel, that you would stir yourselves up

to renewed efforts for the spread of his truth, and to more earnest prayers,

that his kingdom may come, and his will be done on earth even as it is in

heaven. Ah! my friends, could I show you the tens of thousands of spirits who

are now walking in outer darkness; could I take you to the gloomy chamber of

hell, and show you myriads upon myriads of heathen souls in utterable

torture, not having heard the word, but being justly condemned for their

sins; methinks you could ask yourselves, "Did I do anything to save these

unhappy myriads? They have been damned, and can I say I am clear of their

blood?" Oh! God of mercy, if these skirts be clear of my fellow creatures'

blood, I shall have eternal reason to bless thee in heaven. Oh! Church of

Christ! thou hast great reason to ask thyself whether thou art quite clean in

this matter. Ye say too often, ye sons of God, "Am I my brother's keeper?" Ye

are too much like Cain; ye do not ask yourselves whether God will require

your fellow-creatures blood at your hands. Oh! there is a truth which says,

"If the watchman warn them not, they shall perish, but their blood will he

require at the watchman's hands." Ah! there ought to be more of us who are

preaching to the heathen, and yet, perhaps, we are indolent and doing little

or nothing. There are many of you, yea all of you, who ought to be doing far

more than you are for evangelical purposes and the spread of Christ's gospel.

Oh! put this question to your hearts; shall I be able to say to the damned

spirit if he meets me in hell, "Sinner, I did all I could for thee?" I am

afraid some will have to say, "No, I did not; it is true I might have done

more; I might have laboured more, even though I might have been unsuccessful,

but I did not do it." AH, my dear friends, I believe there is a great reason

for some of us to suspect whether we believe our religion at all. An infidel

once met a Christian. "Because," said the other, "for years you have passed

me on my way to my house of business. You believe, do you not, there is a

hell, into which men's spirit are cast?" "Yes, I do," said the Christian.

"And you believe that unless I believe in Christ I must be sent there?"

"Yes." "You do not, I am sure, because if you did you must be a most inhuman

wretch to pass me, day by day, and never tell me about it or warn me of it."

I do hold that there are some Christians who are verily guilty in this

matter; God will forgive them, the blood of Christ can even wash that out,

but they are guilty. Did you ever think of the tremendous value of a single

soul. My hearers, if there were but one man in Siberia unsaved, and all the

world were saved besides, if God should move our minds, it would be worth

while for all the people in England to go after that one soul. Did you ever

think of the value of a soul? Ah! ye have not heart the howls and yells of

hell; ye have not heard the mighty songs and hosannas of the glorified; ye

have no notion of what eternity is, or else ye would know the value of a

soul. Ye who have been broken by conviction, humbled by the Spirit, and led

to cry for mercy through the covenant Jesus; ye know something of what a

soul's value is, but many of my hearers do not. Could we preach carelessly,

could we pray coldly, if we knew what a precious thing it is about which we

are concerned? No, surely we should be doubly in earnest that God will please

to save sinners. I am sure the present state of affairs cannot go on long; we

are doing next to nothing; Christianity is at a low ebb. People think it will

never be much better; that it is clear impossible to do wonders in these

days. Are we in a worse condition than the Roman Catholic nations were when

one man, a Luther, preached? Then God can find a Luther now. We are not in a

much worse state than when Whitfield began to preach, and yet God can find

his Whitfields now. It is a delusion to suppose that we cannot succeed as

they did. God helping us we will; God helping us by his Spirit we will see

greater things than this, at any rate, we will never let God's Church rest if

we do not see it prosper, but we will enter our earnest hearty protest

against the coldness and lethargy of the times, and as long as this our

tongue shall move in our mouth, we will protest against the laxity and false

doctrine so rampant throughout the Churches, and then that happy double

reformation-a reformation in doctrine and Spirit, will be brought about

together. Then God knoweth but what we shall say, "Who are these that fly as

a cloud, and as the doves to their windows," and ere long the shout of Christ

shall be heard. He, himself, shall descend from heaven; and we shall hear it

said and sung, "Alleluia! Alleluia! Alleluia! the Lord God Omnipotent

reigneth."



Provided by:



Tony Capoccia

Bible Bulletin Board

Box 314          

Columbus, NJ USA 08022  

Internet: hyperlink