R.A. Torrey Collection: Torrey, R.A. - Person and Work of Holy Spirit: 21 Work Holy Spirit Prophets Apostles

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

R.A. Torrey Collection: Torrey, R.A. - Person and Work of Holy Spirit: 21 Work Holy Spirit Prophets Apostles



TOPIC: Torrey, R.A. - Person and Work of Holy Spirit (Other Topics in this Collection)
SUBJECT: 21 Work Holy Spirit Prophets Apostles

Other Subjects in this Topic:

Ch 21 The Work of the Holy Spirit in Prophets and Apostles





rHE work of the Holy Spirit in apostles and  prophets is an entirely distinctive worh He im-  parts to apostles and prophets an especial gift for  an especial purpose.

We read in I Cor. xii. 4, 8-n, 28, 29, R. V.,  " Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same  Spirit. . . . For to one is given through the Spirit  wisdom ; and to another the word of knowledge, ac-  cording to the same Spirit ; to another faith, in the same  Spirit ; and to another gifts of healings, in the one  Spirit ; and to another workings of miracles ; and to  another prophecy ; and to another discerning of spirits :  to another divers kinds of tongues ; and to another the  interpretation of tongues : but all these worketh the  one and the same Spirit, dividing to each severally even  as He will. . . . And God hath set some in the  church, first apostles^ secondly prophets, thirdly teachers,  then miracles, then gifts of healing, helps, governments,  divers kinds of tongues. Are all apostles ? Are all  prophets ? Are all teachers ? Are all workers of mir-  acles ? Have all gifts of healings ? Do all speak  with tongues ? do all interpret ? " It is evident from

247

 

248 The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit

these verses that the work of the Holy Spirit in apostles  and prophets is of a distinctive character.

The doctrine is becoming very common and very  popular in our day that the work of the Holy Spirit in  preachers and teachers and in ordinary believers, illumi-  nating them and guiding them into the truth and open-  ing their minds to understand the Word of God is the  same in kind and differs only in degree from the work  of the Holy Spirit in prophets and apostles. It is  evident from the passage just cited that this doctrine is  thoroughly unscriptural and untrue. It overlooks the  fact so clearly stated and carefully elucidated that while  there is a the same Spirit " there are " diversities of  gifts " u diversities of administrations " " diversities of  workings" (i Cor. xii. 4-6) and that "not all are  prophets " and " not all are apostles " (i Cor. xii. 29).  A very scholarly and brilliant preacher seeking to mini-  mize the difference between the work of the Holy  Spirit in apostles and prophets and His work in other  men calls attention to the fact that the Bible says that  Bezaleel was to be " filled with the Spirit of God " to  devise the work of the tabernacle (Ex. xxxi. i-n).  He gives this as a proof that the inspiration of the  prophet does not differ from the inspiration of the artist  or architect, but in doing this, he loses sight of the fact  that the tabernacle was to be built after the " pattern  "shown to Moses in the Mount " (Ex. xxv. 9, 40) and  that therefore it was itself a prophecy and an exposi-  tion of the truth of God. It was not mere architecture.  It was the Word of God done into wood, gold, silver,  brass, cloth, skin, etc& And Bezaleel needed as much

 

The Holy Spirit in Prophets and Apostles 249

special inspiration to reveal the truth in wood, gold,  silver, brass, etc., as the apostle or prophet needs it to  reveal the Word of God with pen and ink on parch-  ment. There is much reasoning in these days about  inspiration that appears at first sight very learned, but  that will not bear much rigid scrutiny or candid com-  parison with the exact statements of the Word of God.  There is nothing in the Bible more inspired than the  tabernacle, and if the Destructive Critics would study  it more, they would give up their ingenious but untena-  ble theories as to the composite structure of the  Pentateuch.

2. Truth hidden from man for ages and which  they had not discovered and could not discover by the  unaided processes of human reasoning has been re-  vealed to apostles and prophets in the Spirit.

We read in Eph. iii. 3-5, R* V., " By revelation  was made known unto me the mystery, as I wrote afore  in few words, whereby, when ye read, ye can perceive  my understanding in the mystery of Christ ; which in  other generations was not made known unto the sons of  men, as it bath now been revealed unto His holy Apostles  and prophets in the Spirit" The Bible contains truth  that men had never discovered before the Bible stated  it. It contains truth that men never could have dis-  covered if left to themselves. Our heavenly Father, in  great grace, has revealed this truth to us His children  through His servants, the apostles and the prophets. TJie  Holy Spirit is the agent of this revelation. There are  many who tell us to-day that we should test the state-  ments of Scripture by the conclusions of human

 

250 The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit

reasoning or by the " Christian consciousness." The  folly of all this is evident when we bear in mind that  the revelation of God transcends human reasoning, and  that any consciousness that is not the product of the  study and absorption of Bible truth is not really a  Christian consciousness. The fact that the Bible does  contain truth that man never had discovered we know  not merely because it is so stated in the Scriptures, but  we know it also as a matter of fact. There is not one  of the most distinctive and precious doctrines taught in  the Bible that men have ever discovered apart from the  Bible. If our consciousness differs from the state-  ments of this Book, which is so plainly God's Book, it  is not yet fully Christian and the thing to do is not to  try to pull God's revelation down to the level of our  consciousness but to tone our consciousness up to the  level of God's Word.

3. The revelation made to the prophets was in-  dependent of their own thinking. It was made to them  by the Spirit of Christ which was in them. And was  a subject of inquiry to their own mind as to its mean-  ing. It was not their own thought, but His.

We read in i Peter i. 10, n, 12, R. V., " Concern-  ing which salvation the prophets sought and searched  diligently, who prophesied of the grace that should come  unto you: searching what time or what manner of time  the Spirit of Christ which was in them did point unto^  when it (He) testified beforehand the sufferings of  Christ, and the glories that should follow them. To  whom it was revealed, that not unto themselves, but unto  you, did they minister these things, which now have

 

The Holy Spirit In Prophets and Apostles 251

been announced unto you through them that preached  the Gospel unto you by the Holy Ghost sent forth from  heaven ; which things angels desire to look into."  These words make it plain that a Person in the  prophets, and independent of the prophets, and that  Person the Holy Spirit, revealed truth which was in-  dependent of their own thinking, which they did not  altogether understand themselves, and regarding which  it was necessary that they make diligent search and  study. Another Person than themselves was thinking  and speaking and they were seeking to comprehend  what He said.

4. No prophefs utterance was of the prophet's own  will, but he spoke from Q-od, and the prophet was  carried along in his utterance by the Holy Spirit.

We read in 2 Peter i. 21, R. V., " For no prophecy  ever came by the will of man : but men spake from God,  being moved by the Holy Ghost' 9 Clearly then, the  prophet was simply an instrument in the hands of an-  other, as the Spirit of God carried him along, so he  spoke.

5. It was the Holy Spirit who spoke in the pro-  phetic utterances. It was His word that was upon the  prophefs tongue.

We read in Heb. iii. 7, "Wherefore as the Holy  Ghost saith^ To-day if ye will hear His voice." Again  we read in Heb. x. 15, 16, "Whereof the Holy Ghost  also is a witness to us : for after that He had said before,  This is the covenant that I will make with them after  those days, saith the Lord. I will put My laws into  their hearts, and in their minds will I write them."

 

252 The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit

We read again in Acts xxviii. 25, R. V., " And when  they agreed not among themselves, they departed, after  that Paul had spoken the word, c Well spake the Holy  Ghost by Isaiah the prophet unto your fathers saying,  etc.' " Still again we read in 2 Sam. xxiii. 2, R. V.,  " The Spirit of the Lord spake by me^ and His word was  upon my tongue." Over and over again in these pas-  sages we are told that it was the Holy Spirit who was  the speaker in the prophetic utterances and that it was  His word, not theirs, that was upon the prophet's  tongue. The prophet was simply the mouth by which  the Holy Spirit spoke. As a man, that is except as the  Spirit taught him and used him, the prophet might be as  fallible as other men are but when the Spirit was upon  him and he was taken up and borne along by the Holy  Spirit, he was infallible in his teachings j for his teach-  ings in that case were not his own, but the teachings of  the Holy Spirit. When thus borne along by the Holy  Spirit it was God who was speaking and not the  prophet. For example, there can be little doubt that  Paul had many mistaken notions about many things but  when he taught as an Apostle in the Spirit's power, he  was infallible or rather the Spirit, who taught through  him was infallible and the consequent teaching was in-  fallibleas infallible as God Himself. We do well  therefore to carefully distinguish what Paul may have  thought as a man and what he actually did teach as an  Apostle, In the Bible we have the record of what he  taught as an Apostle. There are those who think that  in i Cor. vii. 6, 25, " But I speak this by permission,  not of commandment . . . yet I give my judgment

 

The Holy Spirit in Prophets and Apostles 253

as one that hath obtained mercy of the Lord/' Paul ad-  mits that he was not sure in this case that he had the  word of the Lord. If this be the true interpretation of  the passage (which is more than doubtful) we see how  careful Paul was when he was not sure to note the fact  and this gives us additional certainty in all other pas-  sages. It is sometimes said that Paul taught in his  early ministry that the Lord would return during his  lifetime, and that in this he was, of course, mistaken.  But Paul never taught anywhere that the Lord would  return in his lifetime. It is true he says in I Thess.  iv. 17, " Then we which are alive and remain^ shall be  caught up together with them to meet the Lord in the  air, and so shall we ever be with the Lord." As he  was still living when he wrote the words, he naturally  and properly did not include himself with those wto  had already fallen asleep in speaking of the Lord's re-  turn. But this is not to assert that he would remain  alive until the Lord came. Quite probably at this  period of his ministry he entertained the hope that he  might remain alive and consequently lived in an atti-  tude of expectancy, but the attitude of expectancy is  the true attitude in all ages for each believer. It is  quite probable that Paul -expected that he would be  alive to the corning of the Lord, but if he did so ex-  pect, he did not so teach. The Holy Spirit kept him  from this as from all other errors in his teachings.

6. The Holy Spirit in the Apostle taught not only  the thought (or " concept ") but the words in whieh the  thought was to le expressed. We read in I Cor. ii. 13,  A, R. V., " Which things also we speak not in words

 

254 The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit

which man's wisdom teacheth, but which the Spirit  teacheth combining spiritual things with spiritual  words" This passage clearly teaches that the words,  as well as the thought, were chosen and taught by the  Holy Spirit. This is also a necessary inference from  the fact that thought is conveyed from mind to mind  by words and it is the words which express the thought,  and if the words were imperfect, the thought expressed  in these words would necessarily be imperfect and to  that extent be untrue. Nothing could be plainer than  Paul's statement " in words which the Spirit teacheth."  The Holy Spirit has Himself anticipated all the modern  ingenious and wholly unbiblical and false theories re-  garding His own work in the Apostles. The more  carefully and minutely we study the wording of the  Statements of this wonderful Book, the more we will  become convinced of the marvellous accuracy of the  words used to express the thought. Very often the  solution of an apparent difficulty is found in studying  the exact words used. The accuracy, precision and  inerrancy of the exact words used is amazing. ^,To the  superficial student, the doctrine of verbal inspiration  may appear questionable or even absurd ; any regener-  ated and Spirit- taught man, who ponders the words of  the Scripture day after day and year after year, will be-  come convinced that the wisdom of God is in the very  words, as well as in the thought which the words en-  deavour to convey,| A change of a word, or letter, or  a tense, or case, or number, in many instances would  land us into contradiction or untruth, but taking the  words exactly as written, difficulties disappear and truth

 

The Holy Spirit in Prophets and Apostles 255

shines forth. The Divine origin of nature shines forth  more clearly in the use of a microscope as we see the  perfection of form and adaptation of means to end of  the minutest particles of matter. In a similar manner,  the Divine origin of the Bible shines forth more clearly  under the microscope as we notice the perfection with  which the turn of a word reveals the absolute thought  of God.

But some one may ask, " If the Holy Spirit is the  author of the words of Scripture, how do we account  for variations in style and diction ? How do we ex-  plain for instance that Paul always used Pauline lan-  guage and John Johannean language, etc. ? " The an-  swer to this is very simple. If we could not account  at all for this fact, it would have but little weight  against the explicit statement of God's Word with any  one who is humble enough and wise enough to recog-  nize that there are a great many things which he can-  not account for at all which could be easily accounted  for if he knew more. But these variations are easily  accounted for. The Holy Spirit is quite wise enough  and has quite facility enough in the use of language in  revealing truth to and through any given individual, to  use words, phrases and forms of expression and idioms  in that person's vocabulary and forms of thought, and  to make use of that person's peculiar individuality. In-  deed, it is a mark of the Divine wisdom of this Book  that the same truth is expressed with absolute accuracy  in such widely variant forms of expression.

7. - The utterances of the Apostles and the prophets  were the Word of God. When we read these

 

256 The Person and Work of the Holy Spirit

we are listening not to the voice of man, but to the  voice of God.

We read in Mark vii. 13, u Making the word of God  of none effect, through your tradition^ which ye have  delivered j and many such like things do ye." Jesus  had been setting the law given through Moses over  against the Pharisaic traditions, and in doing this, He  expressly says in this passage that the law given through  Moses was a the word of God" In 2 Sam. xxiii. 2,  we read, " The Spirit of the Lord spake by me, and  His word was in my tongue." Here again we are told  that the utterance of God's prophet was the word of  God. In a similar way God says in I Thess. ii. 13,  " For this cause also thank we God without ceasing,  because, when ye received the word of God which ye  heard of us, ye received it not as the word of men, but  as it is in truth y the word of GW, which effectually  worketh also in you that believe." Here Paul declares  that the word which he spoke, taught by the Spirit of  God, was the very word of God*