Online Resource Library
Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.comJamieson Fausset Brown Commentary - Hosea 1:2 - 1:2
(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)
This Chapter Verse Commentaries:
beginning - not of the prophet’s predictions generally, but of those spoken by Hosea.
take ... wife of whoredoms - not externally acted, but internally and in vision, as a pictorial illustration of Israel’s unfaithfulness [Hengstenberg]. Compare Eze 16:8, Eze 16:15, etc. Besides the loathsomeness of such a marriage, if an external act, it would require years for the birth of three children, which would weaken the symbol (compare Eze 4:4). Henderson objects that there is no hint of the transaction being fictitious: Gomer fell into lewdness after her union with Hosea, not before; for thus only she was a fit symbol of Israel, who lapsed into spiritual whoredom after the marriage contract with God on Sinai, and made even before at the call of the patriarchs of Israel. Gomer is called “a wife of whoredoms,” anticipatively.
children of whoredoms - The kingdom collectively is viewed as a mother; the individual subjects of it are spoken of as her children. “Take” being applied to both implies that they refer to the same thing viewed under different aspects. The “children” were not the prophet’s own, but born of adultery, and presented to him as his [Kitto, Biblical Cyclopaedia]. Rather, “children of whoredoms” means that the children, like their mother, fell into spiritual fornication. Compare “bare him a son” (see Hos 2:4, Hos 2:5). Being children of a spiritual whore, they naturally fell into her whorish ways.