Jamieson Fausset Brown Commentary - Matthew 10:3 - 10:3

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com

Jamieson Fausset Brown Commentary - Matthew 10:3 - 10:3


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

Philip and Bartholomew - That this person is the same with “Nathanael of Cana in Galilee” is justly concluded for the three following reasons: First, because Bartholomew is not so properly an individual’s name as a family surname; next, because not only in this list, but in Mark’s and Luke’s (Mar 3:18; Luk 6:14), he follows the name of “Philip,” who was the instrument of bringing Nathanael first to Jesus (Joh 1:45); and again, when our Lord, after His resurrection, appeared at the Sea of Tiberias, “Nathanael of Cana in Galilee” is mentioned along with six others, all of them apostles, as being present (Joh 21:2).

Matthew the publican - In none of the four lists of the Twelve is this apostle so branded but in his own, as if he would have all to know how deep a debtor he had been to his Lord. (See on Mat 1:3, Mat 1:5, Mat 1:6; see on Mat 9:9).

James the son of Alphaeus - the same person apparently who is called Cleopas or Clopas (Luk 24:18; Joh 19:25); and, as he was the husband of Mary, sister to the Virgin, James the Less must have been our Lord’s cousin.

and Lebbaeus, whose surname was Thaddaeus - the same, without doubt, as “Judas the brother of James,” mentioned in both the lists of Luke (Luk 6:16; Act 1:13), while no one of the name of Lebbaeus or Thaddaeus is so. It is he who in John (Joh 14:22) is sweetly called “Judas, not Iscariot.” That he was the author of the Catholic Epistle of “Jude,” and not “the Lord’s brother” (Mat 13:55), unless these be the same, is most likely.