Keil and Delitzsch Commentary - 1 Chronicles 8:1 - 8:1

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com

Keil and Delitzsch Commentary - 1 Chronicles 8:1 - 8:1


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

The families of Benjamin enumerated in this chapter were probably separated from those in 1Ch 7:6-11, merely on the ground that all the registers which are grouped together in 1 Chron 7 were taken from another genealogical document than that from which the registers in our chapter, which form a supplement to the short fragments in 1Ch 7:6-11, have been derived.

1Ch 8:1-2

The sons of Benjamin and Bela. - The manner in which the five sons begotten by Benjamin are enumerated is remarkable, “Bela his first-born, Ashbel the second,” etc., since, according to Gen 46:21, after the first-born Bela, Becher follows as the second son, and Ashbel is the third; while Aharah, Nohah, and Rapha are not met with there, quite other names occupying their place. In אַחְרַח we can easily recognise the אֲחִירָם of Num 26:38, whence the enumeration in 1Ch 8:1. harmonizes with the order in Num 26:38. It is therefore clear, that in our genealogy only those sons are mentioned who founded the families of Benjamin. The names נֹוחָה and רָפָא are nowhere else met with among the sons of Benjamin; but we may conclude, partly from the agreement of the first three names with the heads of the families of Benjamin enumerated in Num 26:38, and partly from the agreement as to the number, which is five in both passages, that נֹוחָה and רָפָא are intended to correspond to the שְׁפוּפָם and חוּפָם of Num 26:39. The only question which then remains is, whether the variation in the names arises from these two sons of Benjamin having had different names, or from the families which issued from Shephupham and Hupham having afterwards perhaps received new names from famous chiefs, instead of the original designations, so that Nohah and Rapha would be later descendants of Shephupham and Hupham. Even this second supposition seems possible, since הֹולִיד in such genealogical registers may denote mediate procreation. If, e.g., Nohah were a grandson or great-grandson of Shephupham the son of Benjamin, he might well be introduced in the genealogical lists of the families as begotten by Benjamin.

1Ch 8:3-5

The sons of Bela. Of the six names borne by these sons, גֵּרָא is twice met with; נַעֲמָן is found in Gen 46:21 as the son, and in Num 26:40 as grandson of Benjamin; שְׁפוּפָן is another form of שְׁפוּפָם, Num 26:39; and חוּרָם may be a transcriber's error for chuwpaam, Num 26:39, just as אַדָּר probably stands for אַרְדְּ, Gen 46:21. The occurrence of the name Gera would be incomprehensible only if בָּנִים denoted sons in the narrower sense of the word; but if בָּנִים fi tub are sons in the wider sense, i.e., descendants who founded fathers'-houses (groups of related households), two cousins might have the same name. In that case, Addar, Shephuphan, and Huram also may be different persons from Ard, Shephupham, and Hupham. Abihud and Abishua are met with as descendants of Benjamin only here, and 'achowach may be connected with אֲחִיָּה, 1Ch 8:7.