Online Resource Library
Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.comKeil and Delitzsch Commentary - Obediah 1:12 - 1:12
(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)
This Chapter Verse Commentaries:
“And look not at the day of thy brother on the day of his misfortune; and rejoice not over the sons of Judah in the day of their perishing, and do not enlarge thy mouth in the day of the distress. Oba 1:13. Come not into the gate of my people in the day of their calamity; thou also look not at his misfortune in the day of his calamity, and stretch not out thy hand to his possession in the day of his calamity: Oba 1:14. Nor stand in the cross-road, to destroy his fugitives, nor deliver up his escaped ones in the day of distress.†This warning cannot be satisfactorily explained either “on the assumption that the prophet is here foretelling the future destruction of Judah and Jerusalem†(Caspari), or “on the supposition that he is merely depicting an event that has already past†(Hitzig). If the taking and plundering of Jerusalem were an accomplished fact, whether in idea or in reality, as it is shown to be by the perfects בָּ×וּ and יַדּוּ in Oba 1:11, Obadiah could not in that case warn the Edomites against rejoicing over it, or even taking part therein. Hence Drusius, Rosenmüller, and others, take the verbs in Oba 1:12-14 as futures of the past: “Thou shouldest not have seen, shouldest not have rejoiced,†etc. But this is opposed to the grammar. ×ַל followed by the so-called fut. apoc. is jussive, and cannot stand for the pluperf. conjunct. And Maurer's suggestion is just as untenable, namely, that yoÌ„m in Oba 1:11 denotes the day of the capture of Jerusalem, and in Oba 1:12, Oba 1:13 the period after this day; since the identity of ×™×•Ö¹× ×¢Ö²×žÖ¸×“Ö°×šÖ¸ (the day of thy standing) in Oba 1:11 with ×™×•Ö¹× ×ָחִיךָ in Oba 1:12 strikes the eye at once. The warning in Oba 1:12-14 is only intelligible on the supposition, that Obadiah has not any particular conquest and plundering of Jerusalem in his mind, whether a future one or one that has already occurred, but regards this as an event that not only has already taken place, but will take place again: that is to say, on the assumption that he rises from the particular historical event to the idea which it embodied, and that, starting from this, he sees in the existing case all subsequent cases of a similar kind. From this ideal standpoint he could warn Edom of what it had already done, and designate the disastrous day which had come upon Judah and Jerusalem by different expressions as a day of the greatest calamity; for what Edom had done, and what had befallen Judah, were types of the future development of the fate of Judah and of the attitude of Edom towards it, which go on fulfilling themselves more and more until the day of the Lord upon all nations, upon the near approach of which Obadiah founds his warning in Oba 1:15. The warning proceeds in Oba 1:12-14 from the general to the particular, or from the lower to the higher. Obadiah warns the Edomites, as Hitzig says, “not to rejoice in Judah's troubles (Oba 1:12), nor to make common cause with the conquerors (Oba 1:13), nor to outdo and complete the work of the enemy (Oba 1:14).†By the cop. Vav, which stands at the head of all the three clauses in Oba 1:12, the warning addressed to the Edomites, against such conduct as this, is linked on to what they had already done.
The three clauses of Oba 1:12 contain a warning in a graduated form against malicious pleasure. רָ×ָה with ב, to look at anything with pleasure, to take delight in it, affirms less than שָׂמַח בְ, to rejoice, to proclaim one's joy without reserve. הִגְדִּיל פֶּה, to make the mouth large, is stronger still, like הִגְדִּיל בָּפֶה, to boast, to do great things with the mouth, equivalent to הִרְחִיב פֶּה עַל, to make the mouth broad, to stretch it open, over (against) a person (Psa 35:21; Isa 57:4), a gesture indicating contempt and derision. The object of their malicious pleasure mentioned in the first clause is yoÌ„m 'aÌ‚chı̄khaÌ‚, the day of thy brother, i.e., the day upon which something strange happened to him, namely, what is mentioned in Oba 1:11. YoÌ„m does not of itself signify the disastrous day, or day of ruin, either here or anywhere else; but it always receives the more precise definition from the context. If we were to adopt the rendering “disastrous day,†it would give rise to a pure tautology when taken in connection with what follows. The expression 'aÌ‚chı̄khaÌ‚ (of thy brother) justifies the warning. ×‘Ö°Ö¼×™×•Ö¹× × Ö¸×›Ö°×¨×•Ö¹ is not in apposition to ×‘Ö°Ö¼×™×•Ö¹× ×ָחִיךָ, but, according to the parallelism of the clauses, it is a statement of time. × Ö¹×›Ö¶×¨, ἁπ. λεγ. = × Ö¶×›Ö¶×¨ (Job 31:3), fortuna aliena, a strange, i.e., hostile fate, not “rejection†(Hitzig, Caspari, and others). The expression ×™×•Ö¹× ×ָבְדָ×, the day of their (Judah's sons) perishing, is stronger still; although the perishing ('ăbhoÌ„d) of the sons of Judah cannot denote the destruction of the whole nation, since the following word tsârâh, calamity, is much too weak to admit of this. Even the word ×ֵיד, which occurs three times in Oba 1:13, does not signify destruction, but (from the root ×וּד, to fall heavily, to load) simply pressure, a burden, then weight of suffering, distress, misfortune (see Delitzsch on Job 18:12). In Oba 1:13 Obadiah warns against taking part in the plundering of Jerusalem. The gate of my people: for the city in which the people dwell, the capital (see Mic 1:9). Look not thou also, a brother nation, upon his calamity, as enemies do, i.e., do not delight thyself thereat, nor snatch at his possessions. The form tishlachnaÌ‚h, for which we should expect tishlach, is not yet satisfactorily explained (for the different attempts that have been made to explain it, see Caspari). The passages in which naÌ‚h is appended to the third pers. fem. sing., to distinguish it from the second person, do not help us to explain it. Ewald and Olshausen would therefore alter the text, and read תִּשְ×לַח יָד. But יָד is not absolutely necessary, since it is omitted in 2Sa 6:6; 2Sa 22:17, or Psa 18:17, where shaÌ‚lach occurs in the sense of stretching out the hand. חֵילֹו, his possessions. On the fact itself, compare Joe 3:5. The prominence given to the day of misfortune at the end of every sentence is very emphatic; “inasmuch as the selection of the time of a brother's calamity, as that in which to rage against him with such cunning and malicious pleasure, was doubly culpable†(Ewald). In Oba 1:14 the warning proceeds to the worst crime of all, their seizing upon the Judaean fugitives, for the purpose of murdering them or delivering them up to the enemy. Pereq signifies here the place where the roads break or divide, the cross-road. In Nah 3:1, the only other place in which it occurs, it signifies tearing in pieces, violence. Hisgı̄r, to deliver up (lit., concludendum tradidit), is generally construed with ×ֶל (Deu 23:16) or בְּיָד (Psa 31:9; 1Sa 23:11). Here it is written absolutely with the same meaning: not “to apprehend, or so overpower that there is no escape left†(Hitzig). This would affirm too little after the preceding הַכְרִית, and cannot be demonstrated from Job 11:10, where hisgı̄r means to keep in custody.