Keil and Delitzsch Commentary - Proverbs 20:4 - 20:4

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com

Keil and Delitzsch Commentary - Proverbs 20:4 - 20:4


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

4 At the beginning of the harvest the sluggard plougheth not;

And so when he cometh to the reaping-time there is nothing.

Many translators (Symmachus, Jerome, Luther) and interpreters (e.g., Rashi, Zöckler) explain: propter frigus; but חֹרֶף is, according to its verbal import, not a synon. of קֹר and צִנָּה, but means gathering = the time of gathering (synon. אַסִיף), from חָרַף, carpere,

(Note: Vid., Fleischer in Levy's Chald. Wörterbuch, i. 426.)

as harvest, the time of the καρπίζειν, the plucking off of the fruit; but the harvest is the beginning of the old Eastern agricultural year, for in Palestine and Syria the time of ploughing and sowing with the harvest or early rains (חָרִיף = יוֹרֶה, Neh 7:24; Ezr 2:18) followed the fruit harvest from October to December. The מִן is thus not that of cause but of time. Thus rendered, it may mean the beginning of an event and onwards (e.g., 1Sa 30:25), as well as its termination and onwards (Lev 27:17): here of the harvest and its ingathering and onwards. In 4b, the Chethı̂b and Kerı̂ vary as at Pro 18:17. The fut. יִשְׁאֹל would denote what stands before the sluggard; the perf. שָׁאַלוְ places him in the midst of this, and besides has this in its favour, that, interpreted as perf. hypotheticum, it makes the absence of an object to שׁאל more tenable. The Chethı̂b, וְשָׁאֵל, is not to be read after Psa 109:10 : he will beg in harvest - in vain (Jerome, Luther), to which Hitzig well remarks: Why in vain? Amid the joy of harvest people dispense most liberally; and the right time for begging comes later. Hitzig conjecturally arrives at the translation:

“A pannier the sluggard provideth not;

Seeketh to borrow in harvest, and nothing cometh of it.”

But leaving out of view the “pannier,” the meaning “to obtain something as a loan,” which שׁאל from the connection may bear, is here altogether imaginary. Let one imagine to himself an indolent owner of land, who does not trouble himself about the filling and sowing of his fields at the right time and with diligence, but leaves this to his people, who do only as much as is commanded them: such an one asks, when now the harvest-time has come, about the ingathering; but he receives the answer, that the land has lain unploughed, because he had not commanded it to be ploughed. When he asks, there is nothing, he asks in vain (וָאָיִן, as at Pro 14:6; Pro 13:4). Meîri rightly explains מֵחֹרֶף by מתחלת זמן החרישׁה, and 4b by: “so then, when he asks at harvest time, he will find nothing;” on the other hand, the lxx and Aram. think on חרף, carpere conviciis, as also in Codd. here and there is found the meaningless מֵחֹרֵף.