1Ti_4:9 serves to strengthen the expression immediately preceding (not the thought in 1Ti_3:16, against Heinrichs), whereas in 1Ti_1:15 (comp. also 1Ti_3:1) the same words refer to what follows. The
γάρ
in 1Ti_4:10 prevents us from connecting them with what comes next. It is no less unsuitable to refer them, as Hofmann does, to the
ὅτι
following, and to regard
εἰς
τοῦτο
… as a parenthesis. This connection is opposed not only by the harshness of the construction, but also by the consideration that, as a matter of fact, the conduct of the Christian, viz.
ἠλπικέναι
κ
.
τ
.
λ
., needed for Timothy no such confirmation as is given in these words.[162]
[162] This difficulty is concealed in Hofmann by laying the emphasis on
Θεῷ
ζῶντι
, so that
πιστὸς
ὁ
λόγος
κ
.
τ
.
λ
. is to refer to the thought that God is a living God.