2Pe_2:6. Third example: The overthrow of Sodom and Gomorrah; cf. Jud_1:7.
This verse also is still dependent on
εἰ
. Schott, without any adequate reason, asserts that the author “has even here forgotten the construction of his expression in the protasis with
εἰ
.”
πόλεις
Σοδόμων
καὶ
Γομόῤῥας
] The gen. as apposition.
τεφρώσας
] Suidas: equivalent to
ἐμπρήσας
,
σποδώσας
: “by burning them to ashes, by reducing them to ashes.”
καταστροφῇ
κατέκρινεν
] not equal to eversione s. subversione damnavit i. e. unditus evertendo punivit (Gerhard, Dietlein, Schott), but
καταστροφῇ
is the dative of reference; see Buttmann, p. 144; cf.
κατακρ
.
θανάτῳ
, Mat_20:18; Pott correctly: in cineres redigens damnavit ad eversionem; thus also Wahl, de Wette, Wiesinger, Steinfass, Fronmüller, Hofmann; only it must be here remarked that
κατακρίνειν
includes within it the punishment, the putting into execution of the judgment of condemnation—which Hofmann, without reason, denies, cf. Rom_8:3.
It is incorrect to connect
καταστροφῇ
with
τεφρώσας
(Bengel).
καταστροφή
, in the N. T. besides here, only in 2Ti_2:14; there, however, in a figurative sense; the same word occurs in the narrative of the destruction of the cities of the plain, Gen_19:29, LXX.
ὑπόδειγμα
μελλόντων
ἀσεβεῖν
τεθεικώς
] Jud_1:7; with
ὑπόδειγμα
, not equal to “example,” but to “type,” cf. Jam_5:10; Heb_4:11, etc. The perf.
τεθεικώς
corresponds with the
πρόκεινται
, Jud_1:7; Hofmann correctly: “God has made them, as the perf. shows, a lasting type of those who ever afterwards should live a godless life.”[68]
[68] Hofmann attaches particular importance to the circumstance, that the judgment which was effected by water was followed by another, which was effected by fire.