Online Resource Library
Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | DownloadHeinrich Meyer Commentary - Acts 6
Verse Commentaries:
Chapter Level Commentary:
καταστήσομεν ] Elz. has καταστήσωμεν , against decisive evidence. An over-hasty correction.
Act_6:5. πλήρη ] A C* D E H à , min. have πλήρης , which, although adopted by Lachm., is intolerable, and is to be regarded as an old error of transcription.
Act_6:8. χάριτος ] Elz. has πίστεως , contrary to decisive evidence. From Act_6:5.
Act_6:9. καὶ Ἀσίας ] is deleted by Lachm., following A D* Cant. It was easily overlooked after ΚιλικΙΑΣ ; whereas it would be difficult to conceive a reason for its being inserted.
Act_6:11. βλάσφημα ] D has βλασφημίας . Recommended by Griesb. and adopted by Born. But ῥήματα βλάσφημα was explained by the weakly-attested βλασφημίας (blasphemies) as a gloss; and this, taken as a genitive, thereupon suppressed the original βλάσφημα .
Act_6:13. After ῥήματα , Elz. has βλάσφημα , against a great predominance of evidence. From Act_6:11.
After ἁγίου , Elz. has τούτου , which, it is true, has in its favour B C, Tol. Sahid. Syr. utr. Chrys. Theophyl. 2, but was added with reference to Act_6:14, as the meeting of the Sanhedrim was conceived as taking place within the area of the temple court.