Eph_5:3.
Δέ
] leading over to another portion of the exhortation.
ἀκαθαρσία
and
πλεονεξία
, quite as at Eph_4:19, the two main vices of heathendom. The latter thus is here neither insatiability in lust, as Heinsius (controverted by Salmasius, de foen. Trap. p. 121 ff.), Estius, Locke, Baumgarten, Michaelis, Zachariae, and others would take it, nor “imprimis de prostibulis, quae sunt vulgato corpore, ut quaestum lucrentur,” Koppe, Stolz, but: avarice.
ἤ
] is not equivalent to
καί
(Salmasius, Schleusner), nor yet explicative (Heinsius), but disjunctive, separating another vice from the correlative
πορνεία
καὶ
πᾶσα
ἀκαθαρσία
(comp. Fritzsche, ad Marc. p. 275 f.); neither fornication and every kind of uncleanness, nor avarice, nor shamelessness (Eph_5:4), etc.
καθὼς
πρέπει
ἁγίοις
] namely, that these vices should not once be mentioned among them. So
αἰσχρὰ
ὀνόματα
(Plat. Rep. p. 344 B, and Stallbaum in loc.) are they!