Heb_12:29. Warning justification of the
μετὰ
εὐλαβείας
καὶ
δέονς
. The words cannot, however, signify: for our God too (the God of Christians), even as the God of the Old Covenant, is a consuming fire (so still Bleek, de Wette, Tholuck, Bisping, and others). For to this end
καὶ
γὰρ
ἡμῶν
ὁ
θεὸς
κ
.
τ
.
λ
. must have been written. Just as little may
καὶ
γάρ
, with Delitzsch, Riehm (Lehrbegr. des Hebräerbr. p. 60, Obs.), Alford, Moll, and Kurtz, be weakened into the mere notion of “etenim.” For
καί
is the enhancing “more than this,” and belongs to the whole clause, in connection with which it would be a matter of indifference (against Delitzsch) whether the author should write
καὶ
γὰρ
ὁ
θεὸς
ἡμῶν
πῦρ
καταναλίσκον
or
καὶ
γὰρ
πῦρ
καταναλίσκον
ὁ
θεὸς
ἡμῶν
, since in either case the main emphasis in connection with the few words would fall upon
πῦρ
καταναλίσκον
. According to the order of the words, and by reason of the intensive force of
καί
, the sense can therefore only be: for our God is also a consuming fire, i.e. He is not merely a God of grace, but likewise a God of punitive righteousness. A diversity, consequently, of the God of the Old Testament and the God of the New, which would also have been an unsuitable notion, the author does not by any means assert. Moreover, comp. LXX. Deu_4:24 :
ὅτι
κύριος
ὁ
θεός
σου
πῦρ
καταναλίσκον
ἐστίν
.