Heinrich Meyer Commentary - John 16:12 - 16:12

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

Heinrich Meyer Commentary - John 16:12 - 16:12


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

Joh_16:12. Jesus breaks off, and states the reason.

πολλά ] Much, that belongs to the entirety of the divine ἀλήθεια (Joh_16:13). That He means only further developments (Luther, Melanchthon, and many others, including Lücke, De Wette), is not to be deduced (see in loc.) from Joh_15:15, comp. Joh_14:26. Nevertheless, the portions of doctrine themselves, which may belong to the πολλά , although they are in general to be sought for in the letters and discourses of the apostles, cannot be completely determined; but neither are they, with Grotius (comp. Beza), to be limited to the “cognitio eorum, quae ad ecclesias constituendas pertinent” (spirituality of the kingdom of Christ, abolition of the law, apostolic decrees), because we are not fully acquainted with the instructions of Jesus to His disciples. In general, it is certain that information respecting the further development of His work, and particularly matters of knowledge which, as history attests, still necessitated special revelation, as the immediate calling of the Gentiles, Acts 10, and eschatological disclosures like 1Co_15:51, Rom_11:25, 1Th_4:15 ff., form part of their contents. The non-apostolical Apocalypse (against Hengstenberg and others), as likewise the ἀποκαλύψεις granted to Christian prophets in the N. T., are here, where Jesus is concerned with the circle of apostles, left out of consideration. Augustine, however, is already correct generally: “cum Christus ipse ea tacuerit, quis nostrum dicat: illa vel illa sunt?” Since, however, we cannot demonstrate that even the oral instruction of the apostles was completely deposited in their writings (especially as undoubted epistles are lost, while very few of the original apostles left behind them any writing), Tradition in and of itself (in thesi) cannot be rejected, although its reality in regard to given cases (in hypothesi) can never be proved, and it must therefore remain generally without normative validity. Comp. on 1Co_11:34. In opposition to tradition, Luther limited πολλά , in entire contradiction of the context, to the sufferings that were to be endured.

ἔχω ] I have in readiness, Joh_8:6; 2Jn_1:12; 3Jn_1:13.

βαστάζειν ] That which is too heavy, for the spiritual strength, for understanding, temper, strength of will, cannot be borne. Comp. Kypke, I. p. 404 f. On the thing: 2Co_3:2. Note, further, Bengel’s appropriate remark, to the effect that the Romish traditions can least be borne by those who have the Spirit.

ἄρτι ] at the end, as in Joh_13:33.