Joh_17:1.
ἐπῇρε
] B. C.* D. L. X.
à
. Curss. Or. Cyr.:
ἐπάρας
without the following
καί
. So Lachm. Tisch. A frequently-occurring improvement of the style. In like manner is the reading
τελειώσας
, Joh_17:4, instead of
ἐτελείωσα
. to be regarded.
ἵνα
καί
]
καί
is condemned by decisive witnesses.
Joh_17:3.
γινώσκωσι
] Tisch.:
γινώσκουσιν
, following A. D. G. L. Y.
Δ
.
Λ
. An error in transcription, instead of which Lachm., following B. C. E.
à
., has rightly retained the conjunctive.
Joh_17:4. Between the forms
δέδωκα
and
ἔδωκα
, the Codd. in this chap. vacillate in various ways.
Joh_17:7.
ἐστίν
] Tisch.:
εἰσίν
, according to preponderant evidence. The Recepta is an attempted improvement.
Joh_17:11. Instead of
ᾧ
Elz. has
οὕς
, against decisive witnesses. The too weakly attested reading
ὅ
(D.* U. X.), which is a resolution of the attraction, testifies also in favour of
ᾧ
.
Joh_17:12.
ἐν
τῷ
κόσμῳ
] after
αὐτῶν
, is wanting in the majority of witnesses; deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. An addition after Joh_17:11.
Instead of
οὕς
, Tisch. has
ᾧ
, according to B. C.* L. Mechanical repetition from Joh_17:11.
Joh_17:16. The position of
οὐκ
εἰμί
after
ἐγώ
(Lachm. Tisch.) is decisively attested.
Joh_17:17. After
ἀληθεία
the Edd., except Lachm., have
σου
, which must be deleted on the decisive testimony of A. B. C.* D. L. 1, Vulg. It. Goth. Sahid. Cyr. Did. Ambr. Aug. A more definite exegetical definition in accordance with what follows. Bengel aptly remarks in his Appar.: “persaepe veritas apud Joh.… nunquam additur Dei.”
Joh_17:19. The order
ὦσιν
καὶ
αὐτοί
(Lachm. Tisch.) is decisively attested.
Joh_17:20. Instead of
πιστευόντων
Elz. has
πιστευσόντων
, contrary to decisive testimonies.
Joh_17:21.
ἐν
ἡμῖν
ἕν
ὦσιν
] B.C.*D. Codd. of It. Sahid. Arm. Ath. Hil. Vig. Tisch. have merely
ἐν
ἡμῖν
ὦσιν
. Lachm. has
ἕν
in brackets. This
ἕν
is a glossematic addition.
Joh_17:23.
καὶ
ἵνα
] B. C. D. L. X. Curss. Verss. Fathers have merely
ἵνα
.
καί
is rightly deleted by Lachm. and Tisch. An interpolation irrelevant to the connection, made without attending to the construction of Joh_17:21.
Joh_17:24.
οὕς
] B. D.
à
. Copt. Goth. Vulg. ms.:
ὅ
. So Tisch. Considering the weighty attestation, and that
οὕς
very readily suggested itself as an improvement,
ὅ
must be regarded as the original reading. Comp. on Joh_17:11.