Mat_19:17. Thy question concerning the good thing, which is necessary to be done in order to have eternal life in the Messianic kingdom, is quite superfluous (
τί
με
ἐρωτᾶς
,
κ
.
τ
.
λ
.); the answer is self-evident, for there is but one (namely, God, the absolute ideal of moral life) who is the good one, therefore the good thing to which thy question refers can be neither more nor less than obedience to His will,—one good Being, one good thing, alterum non datur! But if thou (
δέ
, the continuative autem: to tell thee now more precisely what I wished to impress upon thee by this
εἷς
ἐστὶν
ὁ
ἀγαθός
) desirest to enter into life, keep the commandments (which are given by this One
ἀγαθός
). Neander explains incorrectly thus: “Why askest thou me concerning that which is good? One is the good one, and to Him, thou must address thyself; He has, in fact, revealed it to thee also; but since you have asked me, then let me inform you,” etc. This view is already precluded by the enclitic
με
(as otherwise we should necessarily have had
ἐμέ
).
For the explanation of the Received text, see note on Mar_10:18; the claim to originality must be decided in favour not of Matthew (in answer to Keim), but of Mark, on whom Luke has also drawn. The tradition followed by Matthew seems to have already omitted the circumstance of our Lord’s declining the epithet
ἀγαθός
. The claims of Mark and Luke are likewise favoured by Weisse, Bleek, Weiss, Schenkel, Volkmar, Holtzmann, Hilgenfeld, the last of whom, however, gives the palm in the matter of originality to the narrative of the Gospel of the Hebrews (N. T. extra can. IV. p. 16 f.).
On the dogmatic importance of the proposition that God alone is good, see Köster in the Stud. u. Krit. 1856, p. 420 ff.; and on the fundamental principle of the divine retribution:
εἰ
θέλεις
…
τήρησον
τὰς
ἐντολάς
, which impels the sinner to repentance, to a renunciation of his own righteousness, and to faith; comp. notes on Rom_2:13; Gal_3:10 ff. Bengel well remarks: “Jesus securos ad legem remittit, contritos evangelice consolatur.” Comp. Apol. Conf. A., p. 83.