Mat_27:44
Τὸ
δʼ
αὐτό
] not: after the same manner (as generally interpreted), but expressing the object itself (comp. Soph. Oed. Col. 1006:
τοσαῦτʼ
ὀνειδίζεις
με
; Plat. Phaedr. p. 241:
ὅσα
τὸν
ἕτερον
λελοιδορήκαμεν
), for, as is well known, such verbs as denote a particular mode of speaking or acting are often construed like
λέγειν
τινά
τι
or
ποιεῖν
τινά
τι
. Krüger, § xlvi. 12; Kühner, II. 1, p. 276. Comp. on Php_2:18.
οἱ
λῃσταί
] different from Luk_23:39; the generic interpretation of the plural (Augustine, de cons, ev. iii. 16; Ebrard, Krafft) is precluded by the necessary reference to Mat_27:38. The harmonists (Origen, Cyrill, Chrysostom, Theophylact, Euthymius Zigabenus, Zeger, Lange) resorted to the expedient of supposing that at first both of them may have reviled Him, but that subsequently only one was found to do so, because the other had in the meantime been converted. Luke does not base his account upon a later tradition (Ewald, Schenkel, Keim), but upon materials of a more accurate and copious character drawn from a different circle of traditions.