Php_1:24.
Ἐπιμένειν
involves the idea: to remain still (still further), to stay on, comp. Rom_6:1.
ἐν
τῇ
σαρκί
] in my flesh. Not quite equivalent to the idea involved in
ἐν
σαρκί
without the article (Php_1:22). The reading without the
ἐν
(see the critical remarks) would yield an ethical sense here unsuitable (Rom_6:1; Rom_11:22; Col_1:23).
ἀναγκαιότ
.] namely, than the for me far happier alternative of the
ἀναλῦσαι
κ
.
σ
.
Χ
.
εἶναι
. The necessity for that is only a subjective want felt by the pious mind. But the objective necessity of the other alternative has precedence as the greater; it is more precisely defined by
διʼ
ὑμᾶς
, regarded from the standpoint of love. “Vitae suae adjici nihil desiderat sua causa, sed eorum, quibus utilis est.” Seneca, ep. 98; comp. ep. 104.
διʼ
ὑμᾶς
] applies to the Philippians, who would naturally understand, however, that Paul did not intend to refer this point of necessity to them exclusively. It is the individualizing mode of expression adopted by special love.