Php_1:28. On
πτύρεσθαι
, to become frightened (of horses, Diod. ii. 19, xvii. 34; Plut. Fab. 3; Marc. 6), to be thrown into consternation (Diod. xvii. 37 f.; Plat. Ax. p. 370 A; Plut. Mor. p. 800 C), see Kypke, II. p. 312. In Gen_41:8 Aquila has
καταπτύρεσθαι
.
ἐν
μηδενί
] in no point, nulla ratione, Php_1:20; 2Co_6:3; 2Co_7:9; Jam_1:4.
The
ἀντικείμενοι
(comp. 1Co_16:9) are the non-Christian opponents of the gospel among Jews and Gentiles, and not the Judaizers and their adherents (Flatt), or the malevolent false teachers (Matthies). This follows from Php_1:30, since the whole position and ministry of the apostle was a conflict with such adversaries, comp. Php_1:7.
ἥτις
ἐστὶν
αὐτοῖς
κ
.
τ
.
λ
.] which is indeed, etc., refers to the preceding
μὴ
πτύρεσθαι
ὑπὸ
τῶν
ἀντικειμ
., to which Paul desires to encourage them. This undauntedness in the
συναλθεῖν
, and not the latter itself (Hofmann), is now the leading idea, with which what has further to be said connects itself; hence
ἥτις
is not to be taken as referring to the sufferings, as it is by Ewald (comp. 2Th_1:5), who subsequently, although without critical proof, would read
ἀπωλείας
ὑμῶν
,
ὑμῖν
δέ
.
αὐτοῖς
]
τοῖς
ἀντικειμένοις
is to be taken simply as dative of reference: which is to them an indication of perdition.
Ὅταν
γὰρ
ἴδωσιν
,
ὅτι
μυρία
τεχναζόμενοι
οὐδὲ
πτῦραι
ὑμᾶς
δύνανται
,
οὐ
δεῖγμα
τοῦτο
σαφὲς
ἕξουσιν
,
ὅτι
τὰ
μὲν
αὐτῶν
ἀπολοῦνται
,
τὰ
δὲ
ὑμέτερα
ἰσχυρὰ
καὶ
ἀνάλωτα
καὶ
αὐτόθεν
ἔχοντα
τὴν
σωτηρίαν
; Theophylact. The
ἥτις
involving a reason is just as in Eph_3:13, See on that passage. This would be still more emphatically expressed by
ἥτις
γε
(Klotz, ad Devar. p. 305). But the fact that the
ἀντικείμενοι
do not recognise in the undauntedness of those persecuted a proof (not: causa, as in the Vulgate; but comp. Rom_3:25 f.; 2Co_8:24; Plat. Ep. vii. p. 341 E; Legg. xii. p. 966 C) of their own perdition, and on the other hand of the salvation of the persecuted (
ὑμῶν
δὲ
σωτηρίας
), does not alter the state of the case in itself, that the
μὴ
πτύρεσθαι
is in reality objectively such an
ἔνδειξις
to them. It is, indeed, the
σημεῖον
of the righteous divine cause, and of its necessary final victory. Perdition and salvation: both without more precise definition; but the reader knew what reference to assign to each, viz. the Messianic perdition and salvation. Comp. on the matter, 2Th_1:5 ff.; Rom_8:17; 2Ti_2:12; Luk_12:32, et al.
καὶ
τοῦτο
ἀπὸ
Θεοῦ
] and that (see on Rom_13:11) of God, thus certain, therefore, and infallible. It adds force to the encouragement conveyed by
ὑμῶν
δὲ
σωτηρίας
; for the context shows by the
ὑμῖν
which is emphatically placed first in Php_1:29,—without making the reading
ὑμῖν
necessary, however, in Php_1:28 (Hofmann); see the critical remarks,—that
τοῦτο
refers only to this second and main part of
ἥτις
κ
.
τ
.
λ
. (Calvin, Piscator, Calovius, Flatt, and others, also Ewald and Hofmann), and not to both halves of
ἥτις
(Beza, Grotius, and many others, also Wiesinger, Weiss, and Ellicott). Entirely foreign to the connection is any purpose of humiliation (Hoelemann and older expositors, following the Greek Fathers). Nor are the words to be attached to what follows (
ὅτι
, that) (Clemens Alex., Chrysostom, Theodoret, Erasmus, and others, and recently Rilliet); in which case the (preparative)
τοῦτο
would receive an uncalled-for importance, and yet
ἀπὸ
Θεοῦ
would be obviously intelligible through
ἐχαρίσθη
.