Php_4:13. After the special statement, the consciousness of the
αὐτάρκεια
now finds fresh utterance generally; and in the grand brevity of the latter how marked is the assurance, and, at the same time, the humility!
ἰσχύω
] of moral strength, homogeneous as to category with
ἔμαθον
in Php_4:11, and with
οἶδα
and
μεμύημαι
in Php_4:12, because these predicates also were dynamically meant, of the understanding of ethical practice. There is therefore the less reason for limiting
πάντα
in any way (van Hengel: “omnia memorata;” comp. Weiss); there is nothing for which Paul did not feel himself morally strong; for every relation he knew himself to be morally adequate.
πάντα
is the accusative of the object. Gal_5:6; Jam_5:16. The opposite to it:
μηδὲν
ἰσχύωσιν
, Plat. Crit. p. 50 B, Ael. V. H. xii. 22, et al.
ἐν
τῷ
ἐνδυν
.
με
] Not in his own human ability does Paul feel this power, but it has its basis in Christ, whose
δύναμις
the apostle experiences in his fellowship of life with Him (2Co_12:9). Comp. 1Ti_1:12; 2Ti_2:1; 2Ti_4:17. Thus he is able to do all things
ἐν
τῷ
κράτει
τῆς
ἰσχύος
αὐτοῦ
, Eph_6:10.