Heinrich Meyer Commentary - Revelation 5:5 - 5:5

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

Heinrich Meyer Commentary - Revelation 5:5 - 5:5


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

Rev_5:5. One of the elders[1877] stills the weeping of John, by showing him Christ as the one able to open the book.

The deictic ἸΔΟΎ intensifies the pictorial vividness of the description. Corresponding to the ἸΔΟΎ is the ΚΑῚ ΕῚΔΟΝ , Κ . Τ . Λ ., Rev_5:6; there John directs his look to the Lamb, to whom the elders had pointed him.

ἘΝῚΚΗΣΕΝ . The explanation is divided into two parts. Grot.,[1878] Vitr., C. a Lap., Beng., Eichh., Heinr., Ew., etc., regarded[1879] the ἐνίκησεν in immediate combination with the ἀνοῖξαι , κ . τ . λ ., so that the latter appears as an object to the conception ἐνίκησεν .[1880] Others, as N. de Lyra, Calov., Boss., Ebrard, Klief.,[1881] have, on the other hand, referred the ἐνίκησεν to the triumphantly completed work of redemption,[1882] so that then the infinitive statement, ἀνοὶξαι , κ . τ . λ ., appears not in an objective relation to ἐνίκησεν , but as exegetical,[1883] and the ἐνίκησεν as absolute. The latter conception is correct, because the former combination of the ἐνίκησεν with the inf. is not so much “a new and poetic mode,”[1884] as is contradicted by the mode of statement in the Apoc.,[1885] and because not only the correlation of the designations of the victor, λέων , ἐκ τῆς φυλῆς Ἰοῦδα , ρίζα Δαυΐδ , but also the words, Rev_5:9, which may be regarded as an authentic interpretation of the mode of expression in Rev_5:5, are decisive for the second of the explanations previously mentioned. “The Lion of the tribe of Judah” is Christ,[1886] because in his bodily descent from Judah, as the true Messiah promised of old, he had victoriously fought. [See Note XLV., p. 216.] In the same sense, the designation ῥίζα Δαυἶδ [1887] represents him as a sprout growing from the root of David with fresh, triumphant power. Thus N. de Lyra, C. a Lap., Grot., Eichh., Ew., De Wette, Hengstenb., Ebrard, etc., correctly explain, recognizing the slight metonymy; and Calov. and others, incorrectly, because against the decisive fundamental passage: “Christ, according to his divine nature, is represented as the foundation and source of David himself.”[1888] The Christian fundamental view is presented, which not only in the same words, but also in the same tense ( ἐνίκησα , aor.), is expressed already in Rev_3:21, and is repeated immediately afterwards in Rev_5:9,[1889] only in another statement or explanation; viz., that, just because Christ has struggled and conquered in earthly humility,[1890] he is worthy to open the sealed book. It especially harmonizes with this view, that one of the elders, therefore one of those who have in themselves experienced the fruit of Christ’s victory, and with complete clearness know the entire meaning of this victory, directs the weeping John to the Lion of the tribe of Judah; not as though this elder had observed that Christ meanwhile had besought the enthroned God for permission to open the book, and had obtained it,[1891] but because the elder has the blessed assurance that the exalted Christ, since he is Lord and King of his kingdom, is also the Mediator of all revelation.

[1877] The attempt has been made also to determine who this elder is. Matthew is suggested, because in his Gospel (Mat_28:18) there is a declaration concerning the omnipotence of Christ. N. de Lyra prefers to understand Peter, who, however, had already met with a martyr’s death.

[1878] “He has obtained that which you thought must be despaired of.”

[1879] The older interpreters mostly, with a false parallel to æÈëÈä (Psa_51:6; LXX., νικᾶν ).

[1880] “He has attained, prevailed in a struggle, to open,” etc.

[1881] Cf. also De Wette, Hengstenb.

[1882] N. de Lyra. “Was victor in the resurrection.” Calov.: “Conquered the infernal lion.” Boss., Ebrard: “Victory over sin, death, and the Devil.” So also Hengstenb., who, however, at the same time confusedly falls into the first mode of exposition: “Overcoming the difficulties which opposed the opening of the book.”

[1883] Cf. Winer, p. 298 sq.

[1884] Ew.

[1885] Rev_2:7; Rev_2:11; Rev_2:17, etc.; especially Rev_3:21.

[1886] According to Gen_49:9.

[1887] From Isa_11:10. Cf. Rev_5:1.

[1888] Cf. also Vitr., Herd.

[1889] Cf. already Rev_5:6.

[1890] Because as the slain Lamb he has wrought redemption, Rev_5:13. Cf. Php_2:8 sq.; Isaiah 53.

[1891] As Ew. i. takes it, falling into an error contrary to both the word and sense of the text.

NOTES BY THE AMERICAN EDITOR

XLV. Rev_5:5. λέων ἐκ τῆς φυλῆς Ἰούδα , κ . τ . λ .

The expression is based upon Gen_49:9. On the basis of Jacob’s prophecy, a young lion was emblazoned on the standard of Judah, as it led the van of Israel’s march through the desert. See Palestinian Targum on Num_2:2 : “They who encamp eastward shall be of the standard of the camp of Judah, spreading over four miles. And his standard shall be of silk, of three colors, corresponding with the precious stones which are in the breastplate,—sardius topaz, and carbuncle; and upon it shall be expressed and set forth the names of the three tribes of Judah, Issachar, and Zebulun; and in the midst shall be written, ‘Arise, O Lord, and let thine enemies be scattered, and thine adversaries be driven away before thee;’ and upon it shall be set forth the figure of a young lion.” Augustine, Serm. xlvi., quoted by Calov.: “As a Lamb in his passion, so a Lion in his resurrection; since by this he manifested his fortitude in conquering death, and crushing the head of the infernal serpent (Gen_3:15; Hos_13:14; Rom_1:4).” Cf. Heb_2:14. Calov. finds the lion-like character of Christ displayed also in the call of the Gentiles. The ῥίζα Δαυείδ is analogous with ἐκ σπέρματος Δαυείδ in Rom_1:3, it being, as Hengstenberg remarks, “in David that the lion nature of the tribe came into manifestation.” In Christ, the race of the hero and victor David, whose deeds of courage are celebrated in Psa_18:29 sqq., again comes forth. Calov.’s interpretation, referred to by Düst., which is that also of Ribera and Cocceius, rests upon the assumption that a double designation of the humanity of Christ, in both the Lion of Judah and the Root of David, is improbable; and that, in Rev_22:16, there is a similar distinction between “root” and “offspring.” Lange is right when he says, “The whole designation of Christ is a profound Christological saying, which refers neither alone to the human descent of the Saviour (Düsterdieck), nor to his divine nature simply (Calov.).” The divinely human person is designated by terms derived, indeed, from his humanity; but, because of the personal union and the inseparable participation of both natures in every act, comprehending our Lord also in his divinity.”