μωρὰς
δὲ
ζητήσεις
καὶ
γενεαλογίας
κ
.
τ
.
λ
.]
ζητήσεις
, see 1Ti_1:4; connected with
μωράς
also in 2Ti_2:23;
καὶ
γενεαλογίας
, see Tit_1:4; the latter refers to the contents, the former to the form.
καὶ
ἔριν
[
ἔρεις
]
καὶ
μάχας
νομικάς
]
ἔρις
, like the other words, serves to describe the behaviour of the heretics; it is not therefore
ἔρεις
τὰς
πρὸς
αἱρετικούς
, as Chrysostom interprets it, but quarrels such as take place among the heretics. The
μάχαι
νομικαί
are disputes about the law and the individual precepts of the law; see 1Ti_1:7 and Tit_1:14.
Heydenreich wrongly refers the adjective
νομικάς
also to
ἔρεις
. Hofmann even refers it to all the preceding conceptions, arbitrarily explaining
νομικαί
of the contents of the Pentateuch, i.e. of the Thora; with him, therefore, the
ζητήσεις
νομικαί
are “discussions in which all disputed questions in the Thora are taken up,” and the
γενεαλογίαι
νομικαί
are “investigations into the historical contents of the Thora.”
περιΐστασο
] see 2Ti_2:16.
With these fables and quarrels that go on among the heretics Titus is to have nothing to do.