Works of Arthur Pink: Pink, Arthur - Studies in the Scriptures 1932: 1932 - 11 November

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

Works of Arthur Pink: Pink, Arthur - Studies in the Scriptures 1932: 1932 - 11 November



TOPIC: Pink, Arthur - Studies in the Scriptures 1932 (Other Topics in this Collection)
SUBJECT: 1932 - 11 November

Other Subjects in this Topic:

Vol. XI. NOVEMBER, 1932 No. 11

“Search the Scriptures” John 5:39

THE OBEDIENCE OF CHRIST

Our desire is to contemplate here, by the help of the Holy Spirit, that lovely perfection

of the Lord Jesus which was the very life and beauty of His mediatorial holiness. His

obedience was the absolute conformity of His entire spirit and soul to the will and mind

of His Father; His ready and cheerful performance of every duty and everything which

God commanded Him. This obedience He performed perfectly, amid the greatest and sorest

trials, with infinite respect unto Him whose “Servant” (Isa. 42:1) He had become. The

laws which He obeyed were, first, those to which He was subject considered simply as

man (Gal. 4:4), namely, the Ten Commandments or moral law. Second, those to which

He was subject considered as Son of David (Matt. 1:1), namely, the ceremonial law of

Israel. Third, those to which He was subject as Mediator, namely, fulfilling the commandments

which He had received from the Father to preach the Gospel, perform miracles,

call disciples, and die upon the Cross.

The closer the four Gospels be read in the light of our present subject, the more will it

be seen that obedience to the Father was Christ’s supreme mission on earth. As He Himself

declared, “My meat is to do the will of Him that sent Me” (John 4:34); and again,

“For I came down from Heaven not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent

Me” (John 6:38). Familiar as are these verses to many Christians, few have seen the fullness

of His obedience, or perceived that every act of Christ during the thirty-three years

He tabernacled among men was distinctly and designedly an act of submission unto God.

Limited space will not allow us to attempt much more than an outline of this blessed fact

and truth as it was realized in the life of Him who always did those things which pleased

the Father (John 8:29).

Christ’s birth was an act of obedience. This will be the more evident if we recognize

that every prophecy of God concerning His Son was for Christ a command and the fulfillment

of each prophecy was a designed act of obedience on His part. Hence, in Matthew

1:20-23 we find an angel announcing to Joseph, “Thou son of David, fear not to

take unto thee Mary thy wife: for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit. And

she shall bring forth a Son, and thou shalt call His name Jesus: for He shall save His people

from their sins. Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of

the Lord by the prophet, saying, Behold, a virgin shall be

with child, and shall bring forth a Son.” Thus, in subjection to His Father’s decree the

Lord of glory condescended to be made of a woman. Compare Hebrews 10:5-9.

“Then cometh Jesus from Galilee to Jordan unto John, to be baptized of him. But

John forbade Him, saying, I have need to be baptized of Thee, and comest Thou to me?

And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now; for thus it becometh us to fulfill

all righteousness” (Matt. 3:13-15). Here it is distinctly said that Christ’s baptism had

to do with the fulfilling of “righteousness” or right doing, measuring up to the required

standard. His words to John signified, “Neither you or I can do the will of the Father except

I submit to baptism, and you baptize Me.”

The perfect obedience of Christ appears next in His resistance to Satan’s temptations.

There we see the great Enemy seeking to turn aside the Saviour from the path of com2

plete surrender to God’s will; but in vain. Christ unhesitatingly refused to perform the

Devil’s bidding, meeting each assault with an “It is written,” which was the same as

though He had said, “I decline to go contrary to the Divine precepts, I refuse to disobey

My Father.” Possibly Matthew 4:1-10 will appear in a newer or clearer light if the reader

turns to and sees in its contents a studied effort on the part of the Serpent to induce the

last Adam unto an act of disobedience, and His steadfast refusal to take one step contrary

to the revealed will of God.

The perfect servant of God chose His place of labour in obedience to God’s revealed

will. “Now when Jesus had heard that John was cast into prison, He departed into Galilee;

and leaving Nazareth, He came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is upon the sea-coast

in the borders of Zabulon and Naphtali: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by

Isaiah the prophet” (Matt. 4:12-14). It was not the force of circumstances which drove the

Lord Jesus to select Capernaum as His ministerial headquarters, nor was it of personal

inclination; that town had been singled out by God long before His Son came to earth,

and it was in subordination to the Divine will that He went there. How this shows us that

Christ made obedience unto God the one great business of His life!

His miracles of mercy were wrought in obedience to the Father’s revealed will.

“When the even was come, they brought unto Him many that were possessed with demons;

and He cast out the spirits with His word, and healed all that were sick; that it

might be fulfilled which was spoken by Isaiah the prophet, saying, Himself took our infirmities

and bare our sicknesses” (Matt. 8:16, 17). How striking is the particular aspect

of truth here made known to us! Christ was tender, sympathetic, and full of compassion,

yet the first and deepest motive which moved Him to heal the sick was that the will of

God might be done. Beautifully does this come out in John 11. Though Martha and Mary

had sent a message unto Christ that their brother was sick, He responded not to their appeal

till the Father’s hour arrived: see verses 4-6.

His saving of sinners was in order to render obedience unto God. “All that the Father

giveth Me shall come to Me, and him that cometh to Me I will in no wise cast out; for I

came down from Heaven, not to do Mine own will, but the will of Him that sent Me.”

What a view does this present to us of the redemptive work of Christ! How it magnifies

His blessed submission unto the One who had sent Him into this world!

The Redeemer’s preservation of His people is in obedience to the Father. “And this is

the Father’s will which hath sent Me, that of all which He hath given Me I should lose

nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day” (John 6:39). Thus, the security of the

saint depends not only upon the Saviour’s love unto His own, or His all-mighty power,

but is as well His act of subjection to God.

His very death was itself an act of submission to the Father, for He “became obedient

unto death, even the death of the Cross” (Phil. 2:8). As He Himself declared concerning

His life, I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it up again. This commandment

have I received of My Father” (John 10:18). Thus, there were no limits to His

obedience, no reserve in His subjection to the Father’s will, but complete and perfect

compliance with the same throughout the whole of His earthly life. How blessed it is to

perceive that through and by His Son’s obedience God has been more honoured upon

earth than He has been dishonoured by all the disobedience of all the sons of Adam!

In seeking to make an application of that which has been before us, let us point out,

first, that this perfect obedience of Christ is reckoned to the account of all and each of His

3

people, being that “righteousness” which is imputed by God to them; as it is written, “For

as by one man’s disobedience many were made sinners, so by the obedience of One shall

many be made (legally constituted) righteous” (Rom. 5:19). Second, Christ has left us an

example that we should follow His steps: “he that saith he abideth in Him ought himself

so to walk, even as He walked” (1 John 2:6). Third, obedience is to be the one aim and

mission of the Christian. To us Christ says, “If ye love Me, keep My commandments”

(John 14:15); and again, “If ye keep My commandments, ye shall abide in My love, even

as I have kept My Father’s commandments, and abide in His love” (John 15:10). A.W.P.

N.B. For much of the above we are indebted to an article by J.W. Gillon, which appeared

in the “Western Recorder” of November 15, 1917.

4

THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS

59. The Faith of Noah: Hebrews 11:6, 7.

An Exposition of Hebrews

CHAPTER 59

The Faith of Noah

(Heb_11:6-7)



The verses which are now to engage our attention are by no means free of difficulty, especially unto those who have sat under a ministry which has failed to preserve the balance between Divine grace and Divine righteousness. Where the free favor of God has been strongly emphasized and His claims largely ignored, where privileges have been stressed and duties almost neglected, it is far from easy to view many Scriptures in their true perspective. When those who have heard little more than the decrying of creature-abilities and the denunciation of creature-merits are asked to honestly and seriously face the terms of Heb_11:6-7, they are quite unable to fit them into their system of theology. Where such be the case, it is proof positive that something is wrong with our theology. Often those who are least cramped by sectarian bias find that the truth of God is too large, too many-sided, to be squeezed into human definitions and creeds.

Others of our readers are probably wondering what it is we have reference to above when we say that our present portion of Hebrews 11 is by no means free of difficulty. Then let us raise a few questions upon these verses. If the exercise of faith be pleasing to God, does this signify that it is a thing meritorious? How is this concept to be avoided in the light of the statement that God is a Rewarder of them that diligently seek Him? How does a "reward" consist with pure grace? And what is the doctrinal force of the next verse? Does the case of Noah teach salvation by works? If he had not gone to so much expense and labor in building the ark, would he and his house have escaped the flood? Was his becoming "heir of righteousness’’ something that he earned by his obedient toil? How can this conclusion be fairly avoided? We shall endeavor to keep these questions before us in the course of our exposition.

"But without faith it is impossible to please Him: for he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him" (verse 6). There is a threefold "coming to God": an initial, a continuous, and a final. The first takes place at conversion, the second is repeated throughout the Christian’s life, the third occurs at death or the second coming of Christ. To come to God signifies to seek and have fellowship with Him. It denotes a desire to enter into His favor and become a partaker of His blessings in this life and of His salvation in the life to come. It is the heart’s approach unto Him in and through Christ: Joh_14:6, Heb_7:25. But before there is a conscious access to Him, God has to be diligently sought.

None come to God, none truly seek Him, until they are made conscious of their lost condition. The Spirit must first work in the soul a realization that sin has alienated us "from the life of God" (Eph_4:18). We have to be made to feel that we are away from God, out of His favor, under His righteous condemnation, before we shall really do as the prodigal did, and say "I will arise and go to My Father, and will say unto Him, Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before Thee" (Luk_15:18). The same principle holds good in connection with the repeated "coming" of the Christian (1Pe_2:4); it is a sense of need which causes us to seek Him who is the Giver of every good and every perfect gift. There is also a maintained communion with God in the performance of holy duties: in all the exercises of godliness we renew our access to God in Christ: in reading of or hearing His Word, we come to Him as Teacher, in prayer we come to Him as Benefactor.

But to seek God aright, He has to be sought in faith, for "without faith it is impossible to please Him," therefore, "he that cometh to God must believe that He is, and that He is a rewarder of them that diligently seek Him." There has to be first a firm persuasion of His being, and second of His bounty. To believe that "He is" means much more than assenting to the fact of a "First Cause" or to allow that there is a "Supreme Being"; it means to believe in the character of God as He has revealed Himself in His works, in His Word, and in Christ. He must be conceived of aright, or otherwise we are only pursuing a phantom of our own imagination. Thus, to believe that "God is" is to exercise faith upon Him as such a Being as His Word declares Him to be: supreme sovereign, ineffably holy, almighty, inflexibly just, yet abounding in mercy and grace toward poor sinners through Christ.

Not only is the heart to go out unto God as His being and character is revealed in Scripture, but particularly, faith is to lay hold of His graciousness: that He is "a Rewarder" etc. The acting of faith toward God as a "Rewarder" is the heart’s apprehension and anticipation of the fact that He is ready and willing to conduct Himself to needy sinners in a way of bounty, that He will act in all things toward them in a manner suitable unto the proposal of which He makes of Himself through the Gospel. It was the realization of this (in addition to his felt need) which stirred the prodigal to act. Just as it would be useless to pray unless there were an hope that God hears and that He will answer prayer, so no sinner will really seek unto God until there is born in his heart an expectation of mercy from Him, that He will receive him graciously. This is a laying hold of His promise.

In Scripture, privileges are propounded with their necessary limitations, and we disjoint the whole system of Truth if we separate the recompense from the duty. There is something to be done on our part: God is a "Rewarder," but of whom? Of those who "diligently seek Him." "The wicked shall be turned into Hell, all the nations that forget God" (Psa_9:17): not only "deny," but "forget" Him; as they cast God out of their thoughts and affections, so He will cast them out of His presence. What is meant by "diligently seek Him"? To "seek" God is to forsake, deny, go out of self, and take Him alone for our Ruler and satisfying Portion. To seek Him "diligently" is to seek Him early (Pro_8:17), whole-heartedly (Psa_119:10), earnestly (Psa_27:4), unweariedly (Luk_11:8). How does a thirsty man seek water? The promise is, "And ye shall seek Me and find Me, when ye shall search for Me with all your heart" (Jer_29:13 and cf. 2Ch_15:15).

And how does God "reward" the diligent seeker? By offering Himself graciously to be found of them who penitently, earnestly, trustfully approach Him through the appointed Mediator. By granting them access into His favor: this He did not unto Cain, who sought Him in a wrong manner. By actually bestowing His favor upon them, as He did upon the prodigal. By forgiving their sins and blotting out their iniquities (Isa_55:7). By writing His laws in their hearts, so that they now desire and determine to forsake all idols and serve Him only. By giving them assurance of their acceptance in the Beloved, and granting them sweet foretastes of the rest and bliss which awaits them on High. By ministering to their every need, both spiritual and temporal. Finally, by taking them to heaven, where they shall spend eternity in the unclouded enjoyment of the wondrous riches of His grace.

But does this word "Rewarder" have a legalistic ring to it? Not if it be understood rightly. Does it signify that our "diligent seeking" is a meritorious performance which is entitled to recognition? Of course it does not. What, then, is meant? First, let us quote from the helpful comments of John Owen: "That which these words of the apostle hath respect to, and which is the ground of the faith here required, is contained in the revelation that God made of Himself unto Abraham, ‘Fear not: Abram: I am thy shield, and they exceeding great reward’ (Gen_15:1). God is so a rewarder unto them that seek Him, as that He is Himself their reward, which eternally excludes all thoughts of merit in them that are so rewarded. Who can merit God to be his reward? Rewarding in God, especially where He Himself is the reward, is an act of infinite grace and bounty. And this gives us full direction unto the object of faith here intended, namely, God in Christ, as revealed in the promise of Him, giving Himself unto believers as a reward, (to be their God) in a way of infinite goodness and bounty. The proposal hereof, is that alone which gives encouragement to come unto Him, which the apostle designs to declare."

"Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt" (Rom_4:4): is not the implication clear that grace itself also "rewards"? Grace and reward are no more inconsistent than the high sovereignty of God and the real responsibility of man, or between the fact that Christ is and was both "Servant" (Isa_42:1) and "Lord" (Joh_13:13). The language of Col_3:24 makes this clear as a sunbeam: "Knowing that of the Lord ye shall receive the reward of the inheritance: for ye serve the Lord Christ." The "inheritance" is Heaven itself, salvation in its consummation. But is not salvation a free gift? Yes, indeed; nevertheless it has to be "bought" by its recipients (Isa_55:1), yet "without money and without price." Salvation is both a "gift" and a "reward."

While it be true that Heaven cannot be earned by the sinner, it is equally true that Heaven is not for idlers and loiterers. God has to be "diligently sought." To enter the strait gate the soul has to agonize (Luk_13:24). We are called upon to "labor" for that meat which endureth unto eternal life (Joh_6:27) and to enter into the heavenly rest (Heb_4:11). Such efforts God "rewards," not because they are meritorious, but because He deems it meet to recognize and recompense them. There are those who teach that in serving God we ought to have no "respect unto the recompense of the reward" (Heb_11:26), but this verse refutes them, for the apostle explicitly declares that this forms a necessary part of that truth which is to be believed in order to our pleasing God.

Heaven, or completed salvation, is spoken of as a "reward" to intimate the character of those to whom it is given, namely, the diligent laborer. Second, because it is not bestowed until our work is completed: 2Ti_4:7-8. Third, to intimate the sureness of it: we may as confidently expect it as does the laborer who has been hired by an honest master: Jas_1:12. This "reward" is principally in the next life: Heb_11:16, 2Co_4:17—it is then that all true godliness shall be richly recompensed: Mar_10:29-30. It only remains for us now to add that the ground on which God bestows the "reward" is the infinite merits of Christ, and out of respect unto His own promise. That which He "rewards" is the work of His own Spirit within us, so that we have no ground for boasting.

"By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house; by the which he condemned the world, and became heir of the righteousness which is by faith" (Heb_11:7).

The apostle now presents a concrete example which illustrates what he had said in verse 6. God’s dealings with Noah and the world in his time were plainly a sample and pledge of His dealing with the world in all ages, particularly so when its history is finally wound up. Inasmuch as God is the Rewarder of those who diligently seek Him, it necessarily follows that He is also the Revenger of all who despise Him. In the destruction of the old world, God showed His displeasure against sin (Job_22:15-16); in the preservation of Noah, He made manifest the privileges of His own people (2Pe_2:9). That the whole was a pledge and type is clear from 2Pe_3:6-7.

In the verse which is now before us three things claim attention. First, Noah’s faith and its ground, namely the warning he had received from God. Second, the effects of his faith, namely, internally, the impulse of "fear"; externally, his obedience in making the ark under God’s orders. Third, the consequences of his faith, namely, the saving of his house, the condemning of the world, his becoming heir of the righteousness which is by faith. But ere taking up these points, let us face and endeavor to remove a difficulty which some feel this verse raises. Let us put it this way: was Noah saved by his own works? We believe the answer is both Yes, and No. We beg the reader to exercise patience and prayerfully ponder what follows, and not cry out rank heresy and refuse to read further.

If Noah had not "prepared an ark" in obedience to God’s command, would he not have perished in the flood? Then was it his own efforts which preserved him from death in the great deluge? No indeed; it was the preserving power of God. That ark had neither mast, sail, nor steering-wheel: only the gracious hand of the Lord kept that frail barque from being splintered to atoms on the rocks and the mountains. Then what is the relation between these two things? This: Noah made use of the means which God had prescribed, and by His grace and power those means were made effectual unto his preservation. Must not the farmer toil in his fields? yet it is God alone who gives him the increase. Must I not observe the laws of hygiene and eat wholesome food? yet only as God blesses them to me am I kept in health. So it is in spiritual things: salvation by grace alone does not exclude the imperative necessity of our using the means which God has appointed and prescribed.

The temporal deliverance of Noah from the flood is undoubtedly an adumbration of the eternal deliverance of God’s elect from the wrath to come: and here, as everywhere, the type is accurate and perfect. Nor can any sophistical quibbling honestly get rid of the fact that Noah’s building of the Ark—a most costly and arduous work!—was a means towards his preservation. Then does the case of Noah supply a clear example of salvation by works? Again we answer boldly, Yes and No. But the difficulty is greatly relieved if we bear in mind that Noah was already a saved man before God bade him build the Ark! A reference to Gen_6:8-9 and a comparison with Heb_6:14, 22 makes this unmistakably plain. But does not this fact overthrow all that has been said in the previous paragraphs? Not at all. The Christian’s salvation is not only a past thing (2Ti_1:9), but a present (Php_2:12) and future (Rom_13:11) thing too! We trust that the solution of the difficulty will be more evident as we proceed with our exposition of the verse.



Heb_11:1-7

As we have before pointed out, the first three verses of Hebrews 11 are introductory, their design being to set forth the importance and excellency of faith. Then, in verse 4-7, we have an outline of the life of faith: the beginning of it is seen in verse 4, the nature of what it consists in verse 5, a warning and encouragement is supplied in verse 6, and the end of it is shown in verse 7. Before bringing before us the glorious goal which the life of faith reaches, verse 7 gives us the other side of what was before us in verse 5: there we saw faith elevating above a world of death, carrying the heart of its favored possessor into Heaven. But we are still in the world, and that is the place of opposition, of danger, and hence, of testing. Thus in verse 7 we are not only shown what faith obtains, but how it obtains, it.

Now as we found it necessary to go back to Genesis 3 and 4 to interpret Heb_11:4, and to Gen_5:24 to get the meaning of Heb_11:5, so now we have to consult Genesis 6 in order to discover what is here adumbrated. Let the reader turn back to Gen_6:5-22. There we find unsparing Divine judgment announced (verse 13), a way of deliverance presented to one who had "found grace" in the Lord’s eyes (verse 14), faith’s obedience called for if escape was to be had from judgment (verse 14), the Divinely prescribed means to be used (verse 15); by employing those means deliverance was obtained. Now in like manner, a most solemn warning has been given us, an announcement of coming judgment: see 2Th_1:7-8; 2Pe_3:10-17—let the reader duly observe that both of these passages are found in epistles addressed to God’s children.

In saying above that Heb_11:7 gives us the other side of what is spiritually set forth in verse 5, we mean that it gives us the balancing truth. It is most important to observe this, for otherwise we are very liable to entertain a mystical concept of verse 5 and become lopsided. Satan is ready to tell us that verse 5 presents to us a beautiful ideal, but one which is altogether impracticable for ordinary people—alright for preachers, but impossible for others. After reading our article on verse 5, many are likely to exclaim: We cannot be thinking of heavenly things all the time, we have our daily duties to attend to here on earth: the only way we could reach the standard of verse 5 would be by entering a monastery or convent, entirely secluding ourselves from the world; and surely God does not require this of us. No, indeed; that was the great mistake of the "Dark Ages."

"By faith Noah being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house." This gives us the other side of verse 5. It shows that we have duties to perform on earth, and intimates how they are to be discharged—by faith, in the fear of God, implicitly obeying His commands. And more: our present verse insists on the fact (now so little apprehended) that, the performing these duties, the rendering of faith’s obedience to God, is indispensably necessary to our very salvation. The "salvation" of the soul is yet future: note "saving" and not "salvation" in Heb_10:39, and also compare 1Pe_1:5. In order to be saved from the destructive power of sin, the ruinous allurements of the world, and the devouring assaults of Satan, we must tread the path of obedience to Christ (Heb_5:9), for only there do we escape these fatal foes. Let the reader prayerfully ponder Mar_9:43-50; Luk_14:26-27, Luk_14:33; Rom_8:13; 1Co_9:27; Col_3:5; Heb_3:12, Heb_3:14.

Heb_11:5 and Heb_11:7 supplement each other. Verse 5 shows us that by the exercise of faith our affections are elevated above the earth and set upon things above. Verse 7 teaches us that our lives on earth are to be regulated by heavenly principles. The real Christian is a heavenly man living on earth as a heavenly man; that is to say, he is governed by spiritual and Divine principles, and not by fleshly motives and worldly interests. The Christian performs many of the same deeds as the non-Christian does, yet with a far different object and aim. All that I do should be done in obedience to God, in joyous response to His revealed will. Let us be specific and come to details. Let the Christian wife read Eph_5:22-24 and the husband Eph_5:25-31, and let each recognize that in obeying the husband and loving the wife, they are obeying God. Let Christian employees ponder Eph_6:5-7, and recognize that in obeying their masters they are obeying the Lord; contrariwise, in sulking or speaking against them, they murmur against the Lord!

Now such obedience to God’s commandments in the ordinary relationships of life are necessary unto salvation. If this staggers the reader, let him contemplate the opposite. Those precepts and commands have been given us by God, and to disregard them is rebellion, and to refuse compliance is defiance; and no rebel against God can enter Heaven. Unless our wills have been broken, unless our hearts have been brought into subjection to God, we have no scriptural warrant for concluding that He has begun a good work in us (Php_1:6). "He that saith I know Him, and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar, and the truth is not in him" (1Jn_2:4). The only path which leads to heaven is that of walking in obedience to God’s commands.

Now the salvation of the soul lies at the end of that path. Does the reader exclaim, I thought it was at the beginning of it, and that none but a regenerate person could or would walk therein. From one standpoint that is quite true. When genuinely converted a sinner is saved from the eternal penalty of his sins, and is "delivered from the wrath to come." But is he there and then removed to Heaven? With very rare exceptions he is not. Instead, God leaves him here in this world. And this world is the place of danger, for temptations to return unto its ways and pleasures abound on every side. Moreover, the judgment of God hangs over it, and one day will burst upon and consume it. And who will escape that destruction? Only those who, like Noah, have a faith which is moved with fear and produces obedience. But it is now high time that we considered more closely the details of verse 7.

"By faith Noah, being warned of God of things not seen as yet, moved with fear, prepared an ark to the saving of his house." Ah, here is the key to our verse, hung right upon the very door of it. Like every other one of God’s elect, Noah was saved by grace through faith; and yet not by a faith that was inactive—Eph_2:10 follows verse 9! Faith was the spring of all his works: a faith which was far more than an intellectual assent, one which was a supernatural principle that sovereign grace had wrought in him. God had determined to send a flood and destroy the wicked world, but ere doing so, He acquainted Noah with His purpose. He has done the same with us: see Rom_1:18. That Divine warning was the ground of Noah’s faith. He argued not, nor reasoned about its incredibility; instead, he believed God. The threatening, as well as the promise of God, is the object of faith; the justice of God is to be eyed, as well as His mercy!

Human reason was altogether opposed unto what God had made known to Noah. Hitherto there had been no rain (Gen_2:6), then why expect an overwhelming deluge? It seemed utterly unlikely God would destroy the whole human race, and His mercy be thus utterly swallowed up by His avenging justice. The threatening judgment was a long way off (120 years: Gen_6:3), and during that time the world might well repent and reform. When he preached to men (2Pe_2:5) none believed his message: why then should he be so fearful, when every one else was at ease? To build an ark of such huge dimensions was an enormous undertaking, and, as well, would involve the scoffs of all his fellows. And even if the flood came, how could the ark float with such an immensely heavy burden—it had no anchor to stay her, no mast and sail to steady her, no steering-wheel to direct. Was it not quite inpracticable, for Noah was quite inexperienced nautically. Moreover, for him and his family to dwell for an indefinite period in a sealed ark was far from a pleasant prospect unto the flesh and blood. But against all these carnal objections faith offered a steady resistance, and believed God!

"Moved with fear." This evidenced the reality and power of his faith, for saving faith not only "worketh by love" (Gal_5:6), but in "fear and trembling" (Php_2:12). A reverential awe of God is a sure fruit of saving faith. That "fear" acted as a salutary impetus in Noah and operated as a powerful motive in his building of the ark. "His believing the word of God, had this effect on him... a reverential fear it is of God’s threatenings, and not an anxious solicitous fear of the evil threatened. In the warning given him, he considered the greatness, the holiness, and the power of God, with the vengeance becoming those holy properties of His nature, which He threatened to bring on the world. Seeing God by faith under this representation of Him, he was filled with a reverential fear of Him. See Hab_3:16, Psa_119:120, Mal_2:5" (John Owen).

"Prepared an ark to the saving of his house." As Matthew Henry says, "Faith first influences our affections and then our actions." "Faith without works is dead" (Jas_2:20), particularly works of obedience. "Thus did Noah: according to all that God commanded him, so did he" (Gen_6:22). Privilege and duty are inseparably connected, yet duty will never be performed where faith is absent. Faith in Noah caused him to persevere in his arduous labors amid many difficulties and discouragements. Thus his building of the ark was the work of faith and patience, a labor of Godly fear, an act of obedience, a means to his preservation—for God’s covenant with him (Gen_6:18) did not preclude his diligent use of means; and a type of Christ. As it was by faith-obedience he prepared the ark, so by faith’s obedience came the "saving of his house." God always honors those who honor Him. This temporal salvation was a figure of the eternal salvation unto which we are pressing forward for note that the destruction of the and-deluvians was an eternal one—for their spirits are now "in prison" (1Pe_3:19)! Observe it is our responsibility to seek after our own salvation and those committed to us: see Act_2:40, 2Ti_4:16.

"By the which he condemned the world." The reference is to all that precedes. By his own example, by his faith in God’s warning, his reverential awe of God’s holiness and justice, his implicit and unflagging obedience in preparing the ark, Noah "condemned" the unbelieving, unconcerned, godless people all around him. One man is said to "condemn," another when, by his godly actions, he shows what the other should do, and which by doing not, his guilt is aggravated; see Mat_12:41-42. The Sabbath-keeper "condemns" the Sabbath-breaker. He who abandons a worldly church and goes forth unto Christ outside the camp, "condemns" the compromiser. Noah’s diligent and costly labors increased the guilt of the careless, who rested in a false security. Though we cannot convert the wicked, yet we must be careful to set before them such an example of personal piety that they are left "without excuse."

"And became heir of the righteousness which is by faith." The "righteousness" here referred to is that perfect obedience of Christ which God imputes unto all who savingly believe on His Son: Jer_23:6, Rom_5:19, 2Co_5:21. This righteousness is sometimes called, absolutely, the "righteousness of God" (Rom_1:17, etc.), sometimes the "gift of righteousness... by one, Jesus Christ" (Rom_5:17), sometimes "the righteousness which is of God by faith" (Php_3:9); in all of which our free and gratuitous justification by the righteousness of Christ reckoned to our account through faith, is intended. In saying that Noah "became heir" of this righteousness, there may be a double significance. First, by faith’s obedience he evidenced himself to be a justified man (Gen_6:9), as Abraham did when he offered up Isaac (Jas_2:21). Second, he established his title to that righteousness which is here spoken of as an "inheritance": this is in contrast from Esau who despised his. That righteousness which Christ purchased for His people is here denominated an "inheritance," to emphasize the dignity and excellency of it, to magnify the freeness of its tenure, to declare the certainty and inviolability of it.

The actual entrance upon our Inheritance is yet future. "That being justified by His grace, we should be made heirs according to the hope of eternal life" (Tit_3:7). The great question for each of us to settle is, Am I an "heir"? To help us do so, let me inquire, Have I the spirit of one? Is my main care to make sure that I have the birthright? Am I putting the claims of God and His righteousness (Mat_6:33) above everything else? Have I such thoughts of the blessedness of my portion in Christ that nothing can induce me to sell or part with it (Heb_12:16)? Is my heart wrapped up in that inheritance so that I am groaning within myself, "waiting for the adoption" (Rom_8:23)? Am I walking by faith, with the fear of God upon me, diligently attending to His commandments, thereby condemning the world? If so, thrice blessed am I: and soon shall I be saved "to sin no more."—A.W.P.

12

THE LIFE OF DAVID

11. His return to Judea.

In our last article we left David in the Cave of Adullam. An incident is recorded in 2

Samuel 23 which throws an interesting light on the spiritual life of our hero at this time.

“And three of the thirty, chief, went down and came to David in the harvest-time unto the

cave of Adullam: and the troop of the Philistines pitched in the valley of Rephaim. And

David was then in an hold, and the garrison of the Philistines was then in Bethlehem.

And David longed, and said, Oh, that one would give me a drink of the water of the well

of Bethlehem, which is by the gate! And the three mighty men brake through the hosts of

Philistines, and drew water out of the well of Bethlehem, that was by the gate, and took

and brought it to David: nevertheless he would not drink thereof, but poured it out unto

the Lord. And he said, Be it far from me, O Lord, that I should do this: is not this the

blood of the men that went in jeopardy of their lives? Therefore he would not drink of it”

(vv. 13-17).

No doubt the trials of his present lot had called to David’s mind his happy life at

home. The weather being hot, he expressed a longing for a drink from the family well of

Bethlehem, though with no thought that any of his men would risk their lives to procure

it for him. Yet this is precisely what happened: out of deep devotion to their outlawed

captain, three of them fought their way through a company of the Philistines who were

encamped there, and returned to David with the desired draught. Touched by their loyalty,

stirred by their self-sacrifice, David felt that water obtained at such risk was too

valuable for him to drink, and was fit only to be “poured out unto the Lord” as a “drinkoffering.”

Beautifully has Matthew Henry made application of this, thus: “Did David

look upon that water as very precious, which was got but with the hazard of these men’s

blood, and shall not we much more value those benefits for the purchasing of which our

blessed Saviour shed His blood”?

We quote from another who has commented upon this incident. “There is something

peculiarly touching and beautiful in the above scene, whether we contemplate the act of

the three mighty men in procuring the water for David, or David’s act in pouring it out to

the Lord. It is evident that David discerned, in an act of such uncommon devotedness, a

sacrifice which none but the Lord Himself could duly appreciate. The odor of such a sacrifice

was far too fragrant for him to interrupt it in its ascent to the throne of the God of

Israel. Wherefore he, very properly and very graciously, allows it to pass him by, in order

that it might go up to the One who alone was worthy to receive it, or able to appreciate it.

All this reminds us, forcibly, of that beautiful compendium of Christian devotedness set

forth in Philippians 2:17, 18: `Yea, and if I be poured out upon the sacrifice, and service

of your faith, I joy and rejoice with you all; for this cause ye also joy and rejoice with

me.’ In this passage, the Apostle represents the Philippian saints in their character as

priests, presenting a sacrifice and performing a priestly ministration to God; and such was

the intensity of his self-forgetting devotedness, that he could rejoice in his being poured

out as a drink-offering upon their sacrifice, so that all might ascend, in fragrant odor to

God.” (C. H. M.)

Some commentators have denied that the above touching episode occurred during

that section of David’s history which we are now considering, placing it at a much later

date. These men failed to see that 1 Chronicles 11:15 and 2 Samuel 23 recount things out

of their chronological order. If the reader turn back to 1 Samuel 17:1, 19:8 etc. he will see

13

that the Philistines were quite active in making raids upon Israel at this time, and that

David, not Saul, was the principal one to withstand them. But now he was no longer in

the position to engage them. Saul, as we shall see in a moment, had dropped all other

concerns and was confining his whole attention to the capture of David: thus the door

was then wide open for the Philistines to continue their depredations. Finally, be it said,

all that is recorded after David came to the throne, makes it altogether unlikely that the

Philistines were then encamped around Bethlehem, still less that the king should seek

refuge in the Cave of Adullam.

“And David went thence to Mizpeh of Moab: and he said unto the king of Moab, Let

my father and mother, I pray thee, come forth, and be with you, till I know what God will

do for me. And he brought them before the king of Moab: and they dwelt with him all the

while that David was in the hold” (1 Sam. 22:3, 4). We are convinced that what has been

before us in the above paragraphs supplies the key to that which is here recorded. In 22:1

we learn that “all his family” had come to David in the Cave. From 16:1 we learn that

their home was in Bethlehem: but the Philistines were now encamped there (2 Sam.

23:14), so they could not return thither. David did not wish his parents to share the hardships

involved by his wanderings, and so now he thoughtfully seeks an asylum for them.

Blessed is it to see him, in the midst of his sore trials, “honouring his father and his

mother.” Beautifully did this foreshadow what is recorded in John 19:26, 27.

While Saul was so bitterly opposed to David, there was no safety for his parents anywhere

in the land of Israel. The deep exercises and anguish of David’s heart at this time

are vividly expressed in Psalm 142, the Title of which reads, “A Prayer when he was in

the Cave.” “I cried unto the Lord with my voice, with my voice unto the Lord did I make

my supplication. I poured out my complaint before Him: I showed before Him my trouble.

When my spirit was overwhelmed within me, then Thou knowest my path. In the

way wherein I walked have they privily laid a snare for me. I looked on my right hand,

and beheld, but there was no man that would know me: refuge failed me; no man cared

for my soul. I cried unto Thee, O Lord: I said, Thou art my refuge and my portion in the

land of the living. Attend unto my cry; for I am brought very low; deliver me from my

persecutors, for they are stronger than I. Bring my soul out of prison, that I may praise

Thy name: the righteous shall compass me about; for Thou shalt deal bountifully with

me.” Blessed is it to mark the note of confidence in God in the closing verse.

“And David went thence to Mizpeh of Moab: and he said unto the king of Moab, let

my father and mother, I pray thee, come forth, and be with you.” What was it induced

David to trust his parents unto the protection of the Moabites? We quote, in part, from the

answer given by J. J. Blunt in his very striking book “Undesigned Coincidences in the

Old and New Testaments.” “Saul, it is true, had been at war with them, whatever he

might then be,—but so had he been with every people round about; with the Ammonites,

with the Edomites, with the kings of Zobah. Neither did it follow that the enemies of

Saul, as a matter of course, would be the friends of David. On the contrary, he was only

regarded by the ancient inhabitants of the land, to which ever of the local nations they

belonged, as the champion of Israel; and with such suspicion was he received amongst

them, notwithstanding Saul’s known enmity towards him, that before Achish king of

Gath, he was constrained to feign himself mad, and so effect his escape. . .

“Now what principle of preference may be imagined to have governed David when

he committed his family to the dangerous keeping of the Moabites? Was it a mere matter

14

of chance? It might seem so, as far as appears to the contrary in David’s history, given in

the books of Samuel; and if the book of Ruth had never come down to us, to accident it

probably would have been ascribed. But this short and beautiful historical document

shows us a propriety in the selection of Moab above any other for a place of refuge to the

father and mother of David; since it is there seen that the grandmother of Jesse, David’s

father, was actually a Moabitess; Ruth being the mother of Obed, and Obed the father of

Jesse. And, moreover, that Orpah, the other Moabitess, who married Mahlon at the time

when Ruth married Chilion his brother, remained behind in Moab after the departure of

Naomi and Ruth, and remained behind with a strong feeling of affection, nevertheless,

for the family and kindred of her deceased husband taking leave of them with tears (Ruth

1:14). She herself then, or at all events, her descendants and friends might still be alive.

Some regard for the posterity of Ruth, David would persuade himself, might still survive

amongst them. . .

“Thus do we detect, not without some pains, a certain fitness, in the conduct of David

in this transaction which makes it to be a real one. A forger of a story could not have

fallen upon the happy device of sheltering Jesse in Moab simply on the recollection of his

Moabitish extraction two generations earlier; or, having fallen upon it, it is probable he

would have taken care to draw the attention of his readers towards his device by some

means or other, lest the evidence it was intended to afford of the truth of the history

might be thrown away upon them. As it is, the circumstance itself is asserted without the

smallest attempt to explain or account for it. Nay, recourse must be had to another book

of Scripture, in order that the coincidence may be seen.”

Unto the king of Moab David said, “Let my father and my mother, I pray thee, come

forth and be with you, till I know what God will do for me.” Slowly but surely our patriarch

was learning to acquiesce in the appointments of God. Practical subjection unto the

Lord is only learned in the school of experience: the theory of it may be gathered from

books, but the actuality has to be hammered out on the anvil of our hearts. Of our glorious

Head it is declared, “Though He were a Son, yet learned He obedience by the things

which He suffered” (Heb. 5:8). This word of David’s also indicates that he was beginning

to feel the need of waiting upon God for directions: how much sorrow and suffering

would be avoided did we always do so. His “what God will do for me,” rather than “with

me,” indicated a hope in the Lord.

“And the prophet Gad said unto David, Abide not in the hold; depart, and get thee

into the land of Judea. Then David departed, and came into the forest of Hareth” (v. 5). In

the light of this verse, and together with 22:23, we may see that “the excellent” of the

earth (Psa. 16:3) were more and more gathering to him who was a type of Christ in His

rejection. Here we see the prophet of God with him, and shortly afterwards he was joined

by the high priest—solemn it is to contrast the apostate Saul, who was now deserted by

both. David had been humbled before God, and He now speaks again to him, not directly,

but mediately. Two reasons may be suggested for this: David was not yet fully restored to

Divine communion, and God was honouring His own institutions—the prophetic office:

cf. 23:9-11.

“And the prophet Gad said unto David, Abide not in the hold; depart, and get thee

into the land of Judah.” It is quite clear from the language of this verse that at the time

God now spoke to His servant through the prophet, he had not returned to the Cave of

Adullam, but he sought temporary refuge in some stronghold of Moab. Now he received

15

a call which presented a real test to his faith. To appear more openly in his own country

would evidence the innocency of his cause, as well as display his confidence in the Lord.

“The steps of a good man are ordered by the Lord” (Psa. 37:23), yet the path He appoints

is not the one which is smoothest to the flesh. But when God calls, we must respond, and

leave the issue entirely in His hands.

“When Saul heard that David was discovered, and the men that were with him, (now

Saul abode in Gibeah under a tree in Ramah, having his spear in his hand, and all his servants

standing about him); then Saul said unto his servants” etc. Here the Spirit takes up

again another leading thread around which the history of 1 Samuel is woven. Having

traced the movements of David since the leaving of his home (19:11, 12) up to the Cave

of Adullam and his now receiving orders to return to the land of Judea, He follows again

the evil history of Saul. The king had apparently set aside everything else, and was devoting

himself entirely to the capture of David. He had taken up his headquarters at Gibeah:

the “spear in his hand” showed plainly his blood-thirsty intentions.

The news of David’s return to Judea, soon reached the ears of Saul, and the fact that

he was accompanied by a considerable number of men, probably alarmed him not a little,

fearful that the people would turn to his rival and that he would lose his throne. His character

was revealed again by the words which he now addressed to his servants (v. 7), who

were, for the most part selected from his own tribe. He appealed not to the honour and

glory of Jehovah, but to their cupidity. David belonged to Judah, and if he became king

then those who belonged to the tribe of Benjamin must not expect to receive favours at

his hands—neither rewards of land, nor positions of prominence in the army.

“All of you have conspired against me, and there is none that showeth me that my son

hath made a league with the son of Jesse, and there is none of you that is sorry for me, or

showeth unto me that my son hath stirred up my servant against me, to lie in wait, as at

this day” (v. 8). Here Saul charges his followers with having failed to reveal to him that

which he supposed they knew, and of showing no concern for the circumstance in which

he was then placed; this he construed as a conspiracy against him. His was the language

of ungovernable rage and jealously. His son is charged as being ringleader of the conspirators,

merely because he would not assist in the murder of an excellent man whom he

loved! True, there was a covenant of friendship between Jonathan and David, but no plot

to destroy Saul, as he wildly imagined. But it is the nature of an evil person to regard as

enemies those who are not prepared to toady to him or her in everything.

It was in response to Saul’s bitter words to his men, that Doeg the Edomite made

known David’s secret visit to Ahimelech, and his obtaining victuals and the sword of Goliath

(vv. 9, 10). Nothing was mentioned of the high priest being imposed upon, but the

impression was left that he joined with David in a conspiracy against Saul. Let us learn

from this that we may “bear false witness against our neighbor” as really and disastrously

by maliciously withholding part of the truth, as by deliberately inventing a lie. When

called upon to express our opinion of another (which should, generally, be declined,

unless some good purpose is to be served thereby), honesty requires that we impartially

recount what is in his favour, as well as what makes against him. Note how in His addresses

to the seven churches in Asia, the Lord commended the good, as well as rebuked

that which was evil.

The terrible sequel is recorded in verses 11-19. Ahimelech and all his subordinate

priests were promptly summoned into the king’s presence. Though he was by rank the

16

second person in Israel, Saul contemptuously called the high priest “the son of Ahitub”

(v. 12). Quietly ignoring the insult, Ahimelech addressed the king as “my lord,” thus giving

honour to whom honor was due—the occupant of any office which God has appointed

is to be honoured, no matter how unworthy of respect the man may be personally.

Next, the king charged the high priest with rebellion and treason (v. 13). Ahimelech gave

a faithful and ungarnished account of his transaction with David (vv. 14, 15). But nothing

could satisfy the incensed king but death, and orders were given for the whole priestly

family to be butchered.

One of the sons of Ahimelech, named Abithar, escaped. Probably he had been left by

his father to take care of the tabernacle and its holy things, while he and the rest of the

priests went to appear before Saul. Having heard of their bloody execution, and before

the murderers arrived at Nob to complete their vile work of destroying the wives, children

and flocks of the priests, he fled; taking with him the ephod and the urim and thummim,

and joined David (v. 20). It was then that David wrote the 52nd Psalm.