John Calvin Complete Commentary - Hebrews 11:39 - 11:39

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

John Calvin Complete Commentary - Hebrews 11:39 - 11:39


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

39.And these all, etc. This is an argument from the less to the greater; for if they on whom the light of grace had not as yet so brightly shone displayed so great a constancy in enduring evils, what ought the full brightness of the Gospel to produce in us? A small spark of light led them to heaven; when the sun of righteousness shines over us, with what pretense can we excuse ourselves if we still cleave to the earth? This is the real meaning of the Apostle. (241)

I know that Chrysostom and others have given a different explanation, but the context clearly shows, that what is intended here is the difference in the grace which God bestowed on the faithful under the Law, and that which he bestows on us now. For since a more abundant grace is poured on us, it would be very strange that we should have less faith in us. He then says that those fathers who were endued with so remarkable a faith, had not yet so strong reasons for believing as we have. Immediately after he states the reason, because God intended to unite us all into one body, and that he distributed a small portion of grace to them, that he might defer its full perfection to our time, even to the coming of Christ.

And it is a singular evidence of God’ benevolence towards us, that though he has shown himself bountifully to his children from the beginning of the world, he yet has so distributed his grace as to provide for the well­ of the whole body. What more could any of us desire, than that in all the blessings which God bestowed on Abraham, Moses, David, and all the Patriarchs, on the Prophets and godly kings, he should have a regard for us, so that we might be united together with them in the body of Christ? Let us then know that we are doubly and treble ungrateful to God, if less faith appears in us under the kingdom of Christ than the fathers had under the Law, as proved by so many remarkable examples of patience. By the words, that they received not the promise, is to be understood its ultimate fulfillment, which took place in Christ, on which subject something has been said already.

(241) This is materially the view taken by Beza, Doddridge, Scott and Stuart. The “” is deemed to be especially that of Christ. The ancients heard of him, believed in his coming, but did not witness it. The “ better thing” is considered to be the same with the promise, or to be the Gospel as revealed, or in the words of Stuart, “ actual fulfillment of the promise respecting the Messiah.”

Still there is something unsatisfactory in this view as to “ promise,” as Stuart seems to intimate. There are two verses, Heb_10:36, which seem to throw light on this subject: by the first we find that “ promise” is future to us as well as to the ancient saints; and by the second, that “ better thing” is the atoning death of Christ, which was to the ancient saints an unfulfilled event, but to us fulfilled and clearly revealed, and yet its benefits extended to them as well as to us.

The “” throughout this Epistle is that of “ eternal inheritance” and “ promises” in Heb_11:13 include this and others, and especially “ better things,” that is the Gospel, or fulfillment of what was necessary to attain the inheritance, even the death and resurrection of Christ; or we may say that it is “ better hope,” (Heb_7:19) or the “ covenant, which was established on better promises,” (Heb_8:6.) The verses may be thus rendered —

“ all these, having obtained a good report through faith, have not received the promise: 40. God having foreordained as to us something more excellent, so that they without us might not be perfected;” that is, in body as well as in soul.

The sentiment seems to be this, — “ ancient saints believed God’ promise, respecting an eternal inheritance after the resurrection: they died in hope of this, they have not yet obtained it, and for this reason, because God had designed to fulfill to us what he had also promised to them, even the coming of a Redeemer; it is necessary that this more excellent thing than what had in this world been vouchsafed to them, should take place, as on it depended everything connected with the promise of the ‘ city:’ so that without the more excellent thing fulfilled to us, their perfect state, in body as well as in soul, was not to be attained.”

Their souls are perfect, for we as Christians are said to have come “ the spirits of just men made perfect,” (Heb_12:23;) they who die in the Lord are said to “ from their labors,” and are pronounced blessed or happy. (Rev_14:13.) But they are not in possession of the inheritance promised them, neither the ancients nor those who now die in the Lord.The promise as to both will not be fulfilled until the glorious day of the resurrection. Then all the saints, whether before or after the coming of Christ, will at the same time, with pure and immortal bodies, united to pure spirits, be together introduced into their eternal inheritance which he promised to Abraham and his seed, when he said that he would be their God. Christ referred to that declaration as an evidence of the resurrection. (Luk_20:37.) Then the Patriarchs believed that there would be a resurrection. — Ed.