Online Resource Library
Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | DownloadPaul Kretzmann Commentary - Matthew 26:6 - 26:9
(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)
This Chapter Verse Commentaries:
The anointing in Bethany:
v. 6. Now, when Jesus was in Bethany, in the house of Simon the leper,
v. 7. there came unto Him a woman having an alabaster box of very precious ointment, and poured it on His head as He sat at meat.
v. 8. But when His disciples saw it, they had indignation, saying, To what purpose is this waste?
v. 9. For this ointment might have been sold for much and given to the poor.
In order to complete his narrative, Matthew here relates a happening of the previous Saturday, Joh_12:1-8. When Christ came up to Bethany from Jericho, He took dinner with one Simon, otherwise unknown, who had formerly been a leper and had probably been healed by Jesus. According to one tradition, he was the father of Lazarus; according to others, the husband of Martha. While the dinner was in progress, and the guests, after the Oriental fashion, were reclining about the table, Mary, the sister of Lazarus and Martha, came into the room. In her hand she held an alabaster box of most costly ointment of spikenard, which she proceeded to pour out over the head of Jesus as He reclined at meat. Anointing with oil was the Old Testament method of denoting consecration to the Lord. It was used in the case of kings, priests, and prophets, Lev_8:12; 1Sa_10:1; 1Sa_16:13; 1Ki_19:16. It was also a distinction bestowed upon the guests of honor, Luk_7:46. Mary was not at all saving in her ministrations. She broke off the head of the alabaster flask, just as she had purchased it, and recklessly, lavishly, applied the precious aromatic, so that the whole room was filled with its odor. All of the disciples were taken aback and annoyed, muttering, Why this waste? But one of them, Judas, the treasurer of the apostles, who was a thief, was loudest in his objections. The nard, he indignantly remarks, might have been sold for much, possibly for three hundred denarii, and the money given to the poor. But his show of charity only served as a cloak for his covetousness. The money being in his care, it would be an easy matter to obtain some of it for his own uses.