Online Resource Library
Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | DownloadPaul Kretzmann Commentary - Romans 14:19 - 14:23
(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)
This Chapter Verse Commentaries:
Avoid all offense:
v. 19. Let us, therefore, follow after the things which make for peace, and things wherewith one may edify another.
v. 20. For meat destroy not the work of God. All things indeed are pure; but it is evil for that man who eateth with offense.
v. 21. It is good neither to eat flesh, nor to drink wine, nor anything whereby thy brother stumbleth, or is offended, or is made weak.
v. 22. Hast thou faith? Have it to thyself before God. Happy is he that condemneth not himself in that thing which he allows.
v. 23. And he that doubts is damned if he eat, because he eateth not of faith; for whatsoever is not of faith is sin.
Paul now draws a conclusion which is applicable to all conditions and circumstances of Christians: Let us now follow after the things which pertain to peace and to one another's edification. Everything that brings about and preserves peace, everything that results in mutual edification, should be earnestly pursued and promoted by the Christians at all times. Because through Christ we have peace with God, we want to serve Him in this way, that we live together in peace and edify one another in faith and conduct, instead of quarreling and harming one another. And therefore Paul repeats the thought of v. 15: Do not on account of food destroy the work of God. If we, instead of edifying, building up our fellow Christian in faith, in his spiritual life, tear down the work of God, the spiritual temple, in his heart, and this on account of some paltry food, we certainly become guilty in His sight. It is true indeed that all things are pure, every kind of food is in itself clean and will not produce spiritual uncleanness; but they are all bad and objectionable in the case of him that eats of them with offense, with a bad conscience. Therefore we dare not tempt and lead a brother to do what he believes to be wrong, thus destroying the work of God in him. If our conduct causes our weak brother to eat with offense, to partake of what he esteems impure, then our behavior is harmful, objectionable. On the other hand, it is proper, praiseworthy, not to eat meat nor to drink wine nor to do anything at which our brother takes offense, v. 21. As in the case of meat, so it was with wine in those days: many of the weaker Christians may have feared its use on account of the fact that it may have been used in sacrifices to idols. It is not so much the question of doing the right thing for one's own person as to avoid doing wrong to one's weak brother; hence the admonition of the apostle. This is held before us in the next sentence: The faith that thou hast have with thyself before God. The form of the sentence is emphatic: So far as thou art concerned, thou hast the firm confidence, the unshakable conviction, that in eating meat and drinking wine thou art doing right before God. The stronger brethren were not required to make a concession of principle or to renounce the truth; all that was asked of them was that they use their liberty in a considerate and charitable manner. Their conviction they could hold just the same in the sight of God; it was not to be paraded to the injury of someone else, for God would see and recognize it.
And so Paul concludes: Happy is he that does not condemn himself in that which he approves of. The strong in faith uses food and drink of all kinds, also meat and wine. And it must be a source of great satisfaction and happiness to him if he has the conviction of a free conscience and is sure that he is doing right. It is fortunate if one can make use of all the gifts of God without reproaching himself. But what evil consequences it may have if someone makes a tactless use of his Christian liberty and thus offends his weak brother, is shown in the last sentence: But he that holds doubts when he eats is condemned, since it is not of faith; everything, however, which is not of faith is sin. If the weaker Christian comes to that point that he wavers and doubts, he may finally, before coming to the right understanding, follow the example of the stronger Christian and thus at last eat and drink what in his conscience he still condemns. But such a violation of conscience cannot be reconciled with faith, since it is not done with the certainty that it is right, with the certainty of the conviction based upon knowledge. But whatever a person does without being certain that he does the right thing in so doing, whatever a person indulges in with the fear that it probably is wrong, that is sin. "Any and every action of man of which he is not convinced that it is in conformity with the will of God is sinful."
Summary
The apostle admonishes the weak not to condemn the others, the strong in faith, not to despise the weak nor to give them any offense, and both parties to strive after that which promotes peace and mutual edification.
The Christian's Conduct in Things Indifferent
The admonition which St. Paul gave to the weak in faith in the congregation at Rome as well as to their stronger brethren is the most complete instruction which we have as to the use of things indifferent, such as are in themselves harmless, but may under circumstances become sin. For this was the point of distinction between the strong and weak in the congregation that the former made use of their Christian liberty and believed that all the gifts of God could be enjoyed, while the latter were in doubt concerning the eating of meat and the drinking of wine, and were always battling with a bad conscience.
Now it is very true that the things indifferent lie in neutral territory; they are neither commanded nor prohibited. But from this it does not follow that a Christian in his dealing with these matters leaves his Christian status and assumes a neutral position. A Christian serves the Lord and is the Lord's even when he eats and drinks and sleeps; he lives to the Lord and dies to the Lord, and his sanctification embraces his whole life. So long as things indifferent concern the individual Christian only, he has the right to act as he sees fit and right. He must, of course, be fully persuaded in his own mind that he is serving the Lord in the form of action which he chooses.
A difference with regard to things indifferent has no effect upon the relation of believers to Christ, nor should it have any influence upon brotherly affection and mutual understanding. Uniformity in things indifferent is not essential for the unity of the Church. And since the apostle seeks to preserve peace in the congregation at Rome, he admonishes both parties to regard each other as brothers in spite of this difference; he warns them against carping criticism and condemnation. And the same admonition and warning is in order today in all cases where there is an evident disagreement in matters concerning which the Lord has not fixed a rule. The proper procedure in such a case is to respect the opinion of the other. For matters of this nature should not interfere with the peace of the Church, if only the Christians are agreed in matters of faith and of obedience to the Word of God, and thus live with one another in peace and love. Criticism is justified and should be applied only in case some brother teaches or lives otherwise than the Word of God teaches. To keep the peace in such a case would mean open opposition to, and denial of, the command of God. But where a matter is left undecided in the Word of God, there differences of opinion are justified, and every one must stand or fall unto his own Lord. Of course, the brother that is troubled with an erring conscience may be instructed with all patience, in order to take his foolish scruples from him; but if he cannot be convinced, he must finally be permitted to continue in his ideas. Under circumstances, things indifferent will remain things indifferent for an indefinite period.
But under other circumstances a matter indifferent may cease to belong in this category. If a Christian is bothered with scruples of conscience concerning the use of a certain thing whose use is neither commanded nor prohibited by God, if he believes that indulgence in this matter will not serve his spiritual life and his soul's salvation, then the use of such a thing while his conscience is in a state of doubt is to him a sin. And if another Christian, whose conscience is stronger and freer, uses his Christian liberty in such a way as to forget all consideration for his weaker brother, doing something which is not in itself wrong, but which offends his weaker brother, then he sins in setting aside charity. At the same time it is altogether right and proper, under circumstances even demanded, that we insist upon our Christian liberty over against such people as, in spite of better knowledge, endeavor to bind our consciences with the fetters of the Law. It is self-evident, also, that Christians will always examine whether the matter in question is really a matter of indifference before the holy God. lest sinful joys and practices be placed upon the free list.