James Nisbet Commentary - 2 Thessalonians 1:11 - 1:12

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

James Nisbet Commentary - 2 Thessalonians 1:11 - 1:12


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

A PRAYER

‘To which end we also pray always for you, that our God may count you worthy of your calling, and fulfil every desire of goodness and every work of faith, with power; that the Name of our Lord Jesus may be glorified in you, and ye in Him, according to the grace of our God and the Lord Jesus Christ.’

2Th_1:11-12 (R.V.)

These words of the Apostle Paul were a prayer for the infant Christian Church at Thessalonica, a church founded by him some twenty years after the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth. St. Paul was wishing to encourage the Thessalonian Christians—a small body of believers in the midst of much opposition and many perplexities—to be steadfast in their faith. He bids them look on for the revelation of the Lord Jesus from heaven, as an event in which all righteous judgment should culminate.

I. ‘The Name of our Lord Jesus’ had for the Apostle Paul, and has for all who believe as Paul did, a sacred, a personal, a living significance. No one can fail to perceive the parallel which suggests itself between the petition taught by Christ to His disciples in the prayer to ‘our Father in heaven,’ and the wish of St. Paul here as he looks up and away from earth’s sin and suffering to the yearned-for future of a perfected salvation.

‘Hallowed be Thy Name’ is the primary attitude of a soul turned Godward. But, it may be asked, is such attitude legitimate, Christward? Most assuredly yes, if we honestly receive and believe the gospel records of what Christ was, and taught, and did.

II. How is this Name glorified?—Think of two utterances of Christ Himself. ‘The hour is come that the Son of Man should be glorified.’ He then intimates that through suffering and death should come the glorious issue; and His soul is troubled within Him, and yet confident as to the final victory. Again, our Lord in speaking to His disciples about the Spirit of Truth said, ‘He shall glorify Me.’ God glorified in Christ; Christ glorified by the Spirit; the world attracted, the disciples taught; and disciples thus enlightened, inspired, encouraged, are to preach remission of sins in Christ’s Name unto all the nations of the earth: this is, in brief sum, the function of the Messianic age, the progressive glorification of the Name of our Lord Jesus among men.

III. The effect upon human progress of Christ’s claims and of the response to them is indisputable.—Men recognise ‘Christianity’ as a great transforming power, and as a great ethical force in the world; but do not let us forget that its power is personal and its force is spiritual energy, exercised in the life of Christians. It is no abstract system of theology or ethics that has produced the ameliorating, or expanding, or elevating effects which show themselves in connection with the spread and reception of the Christian religion; it is the practical outcome of glorifying the Name of our Lord Jesus.

Archbishop Saumarez Smith.

Illustration

‘Christ Jesus cannot be disestablished from human history; nor can His resurrection be disproved, though it can be denied. Non-Christian critics are themselves compelled to some extent to glorify Christ’s Name. When Strauss, the German critic, says, “Jesus stands in the first line of those who have developed the idea of humanity,” and that “in Him is condensed all that is good and excellent in our nature”; when Renan, the French man of letters, says that “Jesus is the individual who has made His species take the greatest step towards the Divine”; when John Stuart Mill, the English philosopher (in a passage often quoted), tells us that it would not “even now be easy for an unbeliever to find a better translation of the rule of virtue from the abstract to the concrete than to endeavour so to live that Christ would approve our life”; the Christian believer may—not self-complacently, but gratefully—feel how these testimonies tend to prove that the logical position and the moral certainty of the Christian, who believes, is superior to that of the non-believer, who criticises.’