James Nisbet Commentary - Psalms 122:2 - 122:2

Online Resource Library

Commentary Index | Return to PrayerRequest.com | Download

James Nisbet Commentary - Psalms 122:2 - 122:2


(Show All Books | Show All Chapters)

This Chapter Verse Commentaries:

WITHIN THE GATES

‘Our feet shall stand within thy gates, O Jerusalem!’

Psa_122:2

The psalm from which this verse is taken was probably written by a pilgrim to Jerusalem at some time previous to the Babylonish captivity. On the one hand, it is clear that the house of the Lord, the ancient Temple, was still standing; on the other, the reference to the house of David and the anxious prayer for the peace of Jerusalem, its walls, its palaces, seem to point to a later time than that of David.

I. One thing which would have struck a pilgrim to Jerusalem who should approach the city, as was natural, from its northeastern side, would be its beauty.—In the eyes of a religious pilgrim the physical beauty of Jerusalem must have suggested and blended with beauty of the highest order. The beauty of the world of spirit imparts to the world of sense a subtle lustre which of itself it could never possess.

II. Jerusalem was the centre of the religious and national life of Israel.—Its greatest distinction was that the Temple lay within its walls. No other title to glory and distinction in these ancient days could compete with this place where God did choose to put His name.

III. A third characteristic of Jerusalem was its unworldliness.—(1) This appears partly in its very situation. Jerusalem was not on the sea or on a navigable river. Isaiah rejoiced in ‘Zion, the city of our solemnities, as a quiet habitation, wherein shall no galley with oars, neither shall gallant ship, pass by.’ In his eyes its religious character as well as its security are ensured by its seclusion from the great highways of the world of his day. (2) This characteristic may be further illustrated by the smallness of Jerusalem. No large capital could have existed in such a situation. In point of area Jerusalem would ill compare with our larger London parishes, Marylebone or Islington. Yet no city in the world has so profoundly influenced the highest life of millions of the human race as has that little highland town in a remote province of the empire of Turkey.

IV. Once more, as the centuries went on, Jerusalem became yet dearer to the heart of Israel by misfortune.—Of all that is most beautiful in life sorrow is the last consecration. Undoubtedly the author of our psalm would already have seen in Jerusalem a pathos and a dignity which so often come with suffering, and those who used this psalm in later ages would have felt increasingly this element of the attraction of the holy city.

V. The Jerusalem of Christian thought is no longer only or mainly the ‘city of David.’—It is first of all the visible and universal Church of Christ. And it suggests another city, a true haven of peace, into which all those true children of Zion who are joyful in their King will one day be received.

Canon Liddon.