3. For ο κυριος, AD*G 71, with some latt, Ambrst, have ο θεος—conformed to 1Th 5:23; 1Co 1:9, &c.
Baljon proposes for υμας the emendation ημας (cf. 2Ti 4:18), which gives a smoother sense after 2Th 3:2 (see Expository Note); he quotes Bentley in favour of the change. The confusion of these pronouns being so very common, it is curious that no MS. evidence is forthcoming for the 1st plural here, where it is plausible.