The husband from the first had supreme authority over his wife, or wives, and children. In his own domain his rule was well-nigh absolute. The wife, or wives, looked up to him as their lord (). He was chief (compare Arabic shēıÌk), and to dishonor him was a crime to be punished by death (, ). He was permitted to divorce his wife with little reason, and divorces were all too common (, , , ; ; ; ; , etc.). The wife seems to have had no redress if wronged by him. Absolute faithfulness, though required of the wife, was apparently not expected or exacted of the husband, so long as he did not violate the rights of another husband. In general among Eastern people women were lightly esteemed, as in the Japhetic nations they came to be. Plato counted a state “disorganized†“where slaves are disobedient to their masters, and wives are on equality with their husbands.†“Is there a human being,†asks Socrates, “with whom you talk less than with your wife?†But from the first, among the Hebrews the ideal husband trained his household in the way they should go religiously, as well as instructed them in the traditions of the family, the tribe, and the nation (; ; ; , etc.). It was due to this, in part at least, that, in spite of the discords and evils incident to polygamy, the Hebrew household was nursery of virtue and piety to an unusual degree, and became a genuine anticipation of the ideal realized later in the Christian home (; ; ).
Used figuratively of the relation (1) between Yahweh and His people (; ; f); (2) between Christ and His church (; ; ; ; ).